The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sustainable Refugee Return: Triggers, Constraints, and Lessons on Addressing the Development Challenges of Forced Displacement
Open accessAbstract
Refugee return is one of the three so-called durable solutions to refugee displacement envisaged by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the international community. The objective of this study is to identify the conditions that influence the decisions by refugees in protracted displacement regarding return to their home country - when, why, and by whom are decisions on return or other coping strategies made, and how are they affected both by life in exile and by the situation in the country of origin. The primary purpose of the study is to inform the World Bank’s country and regional strategies, as well as its operational approaches on ways to address forced displacement by showing that well thought out development actions that are responsive to the circumstances of specific displacement situations can contribute to the sustainable return and reintegration for displaced. Using a desk study method, the analysis has drawn on the existing literature on refugee decision-making regarding return together with eight country return cases. The study assesses both the conditions of life in asylum and those in the country of origin including activities to support reconstruction and development by governments and development actors including the World Bank, that have influenced whether, and to which extent, refugees were able to return in a durable manner or have adapted in other ways to opportunities and constraints in places of exile and origin. This paper will make the case that to assist return to become sustainable, it is necessary to also address development challenges affecting both the returnees and those who remained, and these cannot be met alone through short-term humanitarian efforts alongside political, social, peace building, and security considerations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“many refugees do not return to their origin areas but instead move to urban areas in their origin country in the hope of finding employment, security, and access to services”
From Who reintegrates? The constituents of reintegration of displaced populations (2018) · cites this paper as Harild et al. (2015)
In the citing paper
“urban returnees often reside in poor urban areas and struggle to achieve sustainable livelihoods”
From Who reintegrates? The constituents of reintegration of displaced populations (2018) · cites this paper as Harild et al. (2015)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Who reintegrates? The constituents of reintegration of displaced populations
Fransen, S., & Bilgili, Ö. (2018) · Population, Space and Place · doi:10.1002/psp.2140 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Harild, N., Christensen, A., & Zetter, R.
- ORCID
- Zetter, Roger
- Publisher
- World Bank Group, Washington, DC
- Published
- 2015-08
- OpenAlex
- W4410078976
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Keywords
- refugee return, sustainable return, durable solutions, forced displacement, protracted displacement, refugee decision-making, reintegration, development challenges, country of origin, asylum, reconstruction and development, World Bank, peacebuilding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable Refugee Return: Triggers, Constraints, and Lessons on Addressing the Development Challenges of Forced Displacement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/22751
- The paper
- Harild, N., Christensen, A., & Zetter, R. (2015). Sustainable Refugee Return: Triggers, Constraints, and Lessons on Addressing the Development Challenges of Forced Displacement. https://doi.org/10.1596/22751