The DOI matches its Crossref record.
World Development Report 2011
Open accessAbstract
The 2011 World development report looks across disciplines and experiences drawn from around the world to offer some ideas and practical recommendations on how to move beyond conflict and fragility and secure development. The key messages are important for all countries-low, middle, and high income-as well as for regional and global institutions: first, institutional legitimacy is the key to stability. When state institutions do not adequately protect citizens, guard against corruption, or provide access to justice; when markets do not provide job opportunities; or when communities have lost social cohesion-the likelihood of violent conflict increases. Second, investing in citizen security, justice, and jobs is essential to reducing violence. But there are major structural gaps in our collective capabilities to support these areas. Third, confronting this challenge effectively means that institutions need to change. International agencies and partners from other countries must adapt procedures so they can respond with agility and speed, a longer-term perspective, and greater staying power. Fourth, need to adopt a layered approach. Some problems can be addressed at the country level, but others need to be addressed at a regional level, such as developing markets that integrate insecure areas and pooling resources for building capacity Fifth, in adopting these approaches, need to be aware that the global landscape is changing. Regional institutions and middle income countries are playing a larger role. This means should pay more attention to south-south and south-north exchanges, and to the recent transition experiences of middle income countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Looking Like a State: Techniques of Persistent Failure in State Capability for Implementation
Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M., & Andrews, M. (2013) · Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.709614 · Cited by 441
The Influence of Formal and Informal Institutional Voids on Entrepreneurship
Webb, J. W., Khoury, T. A., & Hitt, M. A. (2020) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258719830310 · Cited by 411
The strength of weak states? Non-state security forces and hybrid governance in Africa
Meagher, K. (2012) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01794.x · Cited by 346
No extraction without representation: The ethno-regional oil curse and secessionist conflict
Hunziker, P., & Cederman, L.-E. (2017) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343316687365 · Cited by 65
The Role of Foreign Direct Investment in Post-Conflict Economic Recovery and Peace-Building
Bak, D., Lee, H., & Biglaiser, G. (2024) · Foreign Policy Analysis · doi:10.1093/fpa/orae032 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Bank, W.
- Publisher
- World Bank
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W4229883593
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.25
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: World Development Report 2011. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1596/978-0-8213-8439-8
- The paper
- Bank, W. (2011). World Development Report 2011. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8439-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.