CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDisability Education and EmploymentDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Access and Benefits: Assistive Technology in Adult Literacy

Silver‐Pacuilla, Heidi·2006·Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
DOI 10.1598/jaal.50.2.4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Through access to assistive technology, adult students with learning disabilities can improve their literacy skills and goal attainment as a supplement to regular adult basic education classes. This article describes a project that investigated whether increased engagement with text‐to‐speech and speech‐recognition software could improve participants' foundational literacy skills. Data were gathered through careful observations as well as reflective dialogue with the learners. Three layers are explored: The underlying framework of dialogic research Thematic analysis of students' interactions with the equipment Thematic analysis of the role of the coach Through a series of snapshots of students' approaches to literacy learning with assistive technology and a cross‐case analysis, possibilities and complexities are revealed in the intersection of literacy and technology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1598/jaal.50.2.4

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Corely M.A., 2002, Annual review of adult learning and literacy, 44
  2. Fingeret H.A., 1997, Literacy for life: Adult learners, new practices
  3. Freire P., 1970, Pedagogy of the oppressed
  4. Glaser B.G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory
  5. International Reading Association, 2004, The role and qualifications of the reading coach in the United States
  6. Kaufman P., 2001, Executive summary of the statistical analysis report of dropout rates in the United States: 2000
  7. Marder C., 1992, How well are youth with disabilities really doing? A comparison of youth with disabilities and youth in general
  8. National Adult Literacy and Learning Disabilities Center, 1999, Bridges to practice: A research‐based guide for literacy practitioners serving adults with learning disabilities
  9. Office of Special Education Programs, 2002, Twenty‐fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
  10. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1001/jama.1990.03450080084036 · DOI
  12. Silver‐Pacuilla H., 2004, Assistive technology and adult literacy: Bridging the gap for adults with learning disabilities
  13. Tyler J.H., 2000, Cognitive skills matter in the labor market, even for school dropouts (Report No. 15)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Silver‐Pacuilla, H.
Affiliations
American Institutes for Research (US)
Corresponding author
Silver‐Pacuilla, Heidi
Venue
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-10
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
114-125
ISSN
  • 1081-3004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2706
DOI
10.1598/jaal.50.2.4
OpenAlex
W2024720611
Cited by
19
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1865 d)
Locations
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
assistive technology, adult literacy, learning disabilities, text-to-speech software, speech recognition software, adult basic education, dialogical research, student engagement, literacy coaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review