Cited by 157Literacy and Educational PracticesReading and Literacy DevelopmentEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Engagement in Reading: Lessons Learned From Three PISA Countries

Brozo, William G., Shiel, Gerry, Topping, Keith·2007·Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy

Abstract

The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is a global effort to assess reading literacy. The authors of this article focus on the variable of engagement—the student characteristic on PISA that had the largest correlation with achievement in reading. Next, salient findings related to engagement from three English‐speaking PISA countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, and Ireland) are presented. The authors conclude with a discussion of lessons about reading engagement derived from findings common to the authors' three nations with implications for policy and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1598/jaal.51.4.2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brozo, Shiel and Topping (2007) found that students who read a diverse range of texts achieve higher scores on PISA than those who do not.

    “Brozo, Shiel and Topping (2007) used data from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) to show that students who read a diverse range of texts achieve higher scores on this cognitive test than those who do not.”

    From Does it matter what children read? New evidence using longitudinal census data from Spain (2020) · cites this paper as Brozo, Shiel and Topping (2007)

  • Differences in the frequency with which young people read may help to explain gender and socio-economic achievement gaps.

    “Research suggests that differences in frequency with which young people read may help to explain gender and socio-economic achievement gaps (Brozo et al, 2007;Cremin et al, 2014;Krashen et al 2012;Sullivan and Brown, 2015).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 18 · Cited by 157

Authors
Brozo, W. G., Shiel, G., & Topping, K.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Brozo, William G.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
304-315
ISSN
  • 1081-3004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2706
OpenAlex
W2092677788
Cited by
157
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
reading engagement, reading literacy, PISA, student engagement, reading achievement, English-speaking countries, United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, education policy, reading instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review