The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical Inference on Associated Fertility Life Table Parameters Using Jackknife Technique: Computational Aspects
Open accessAbstract
Knowledge of population growth potential is crucial for studying population dynamics and for establishing management tactics for pest control. Estimation of population growth can be achieved with fertility life tables because they synthesize data on reproduction and mortality of a population. The five main parameters associated with a fertility life table are as follows: (1) the net reproductive rate (Ro), (2) the intrinsic rate of increase (rm), 3) the mean generation time (T), (4) the doubling time (Dt), and (5) the finite rate of increase (lambda). Jackknife and bootstrap techniques are used to calculate the variance of the rm estimate, which can be extended to the other parameters of life tables. Those methods are computer-intensive, their application requires the development of efficient algorithms, and their implementation is based on a programming language that encompasses quickness and reliability. The objectives of this article are to discuss statistical and computational aspects related to estimation of life table parameters and to present a SAS program that uses jackknife to estimate parameters for fertility life tables. The SAS program presented here allows the calculation of confidence intervals for all estimated parameters, as well as provides one-sided and two-sided t-tests to perform pairwise or multiple comparison between groups, with their respective P values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Biostatistical Analysis (2nd ed.).
Breen, T. J., & Zar, J. H. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289268 · Cited by 5,781
Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions
Šidák, Z. (1967) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935 · Cited by 2,639
The Intrinsic Rate of Natural Increase of an Insect Population
Birch, L. C. (1948) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/1605 · Cited by 2,579
Estimating Uncertainty in Population Growth Rates: Jackknife vs. Bootstrap Techniques
Meyer, J. S., Ingersoll, C. G., McDonald, L. L., & Boyce, M. S. (1986) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938671 · Cited by 982
Hulting, F. L., Orr, D. B., & Obrycki, J. J. (1990) · Florida Entomologist · doi:10.2307/3495274 · Cited by 168
Can Population Effects of Pesticides Be Predicted from Demographic Toxicological Studies?
Stark, J. D., & Wennergren, U. (1995) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/88.5.1089 · Cited by 142
Cited by
Ali, M. P., Haque, S. S., Hossain, M. M., Bari, M. N., Kabir, M. M. M., Roy, T. K., Datta, J., Howlader, M. T. H., Alam, S. N., & Krupnik, T. J. (2023) · CABI Agriculture and Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s43170-023-00162-6 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Maia, A. D. H. N., Luiz, A. J. B., & Campanhola, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 511-518
- ISSN
- 0022-0493 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-291X
- OpenAlex
- W2176902923
- Cited by
- 834
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Inference on Associated Fertility Life Table Parameters Using Jackknife Technique: Computational Aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1603/0022-0493-93.2.511
- The paper
- Maia, A. D. H. N., Luiz, A. J. B., & Campanhola, C. (2000). Statistical Inference on Associated Fertility Life Table Parameters Using Jackknife Technique: Computational Aspects. Journal of Economic Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.2.511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.