The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and Survival of Immature Aedes albopictus and Aedes triseriatus(Diptera: Culicidae) in the Laboratory: Effects of Density, Food, and Competition on Response to Temperature
Abstract
Effects of food, density, and heterospecific interactions on temperature-dependent development of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Aedes triseriatus (Say) larvae and pupae were described using a degree-day model. Under all conditions, the predicted number of degree-days (DD(T0)) to complete larval development was less, and the threshold temperature (T0) for initiation of larval development was higher for Ae. albopictus than for Ae. triseriatus. The DD(T0) for both species was food and density dependent. However, the per capita food ration appeared to exert a greater influence on the developmental times of Ae. triseriatus immatures, whereas for Ae. albopictus effects of density were not completely eliminated by an increase in the per capita food ration. The presence of heterospecific larvae did not prolong the DD(T0) of either species. At the low food ration, DD(T0) for both species were significantly greater under conspecific conditions. The DD(T0) for Ae. triseriatus increased directly as the proportion of conspecific larvae increased. However, when a higher per capita food ration was provided, conspecific effects on DD(T0) were mitigated. For Ae. albopictus, estimated DD(T0) values for larvae reared in pure culture were significantly higher than when heterospecific larvae were present, regardless of the per capita amount of food provided. Survivorship of immatures was density and food-dependent for both species. Ae. albopictus exhibited higher immature survivorship under all conditions relative to Ae. triseriatus. For both species, survival probabilities were lowest under conditions of high density and low food. Addition of food improved survival for both species. The presence of heterospecific larvae exerted a differential effect on the survivorship response of Ae. albopictus immatures to temperature. Lowest probability of survival for Ae. albopictus was occurred at low temperature when the proportion of heterospecific larvae in containers was the highest. In contrast, at high temperatures, survivorship of immatures improved, but was lowest for pure species cultures. For Ae. triseriatus, survivorship of immatures was consistently lower for pure species cultures regardless of the temperature. Standing crop production of adults of both species was primarily food rather that density-dependent. Under field conditions, Ae. triseriatus were predicted to initiate development sooner and exhibit faster population growth early in the season than Ae. albopictus. However, because of the shorter DD(T0), Ae. albopictus population growth was predicted to surpass that of Ae. triseriatus populations later in the season. Based on optimal DD(T0) values from laboratory experiments, spring emergence dates of Ae. triseriatus females in western North Carolina for 1989 and 1990 were predicted from accumulated degree-days calculated from local air temperature records. Predicted emergence dates were congruent with results of a previous survey for the same locality, indicating that accumulated degree-days can be used to accurately predict the seasonal occurrence of Ae. triseriatus. The utility of the degree-day approach in predicting the phenology of Ae. albopictus remains to be established.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mordecai, E. A., Cohen, J. M., Evans, M. V., Gudapati, P., Johnson, L. R., Lippi, C. A., Miazgowicz, K., Murdock, C. C., Rohr, J. R., Ryan, S. J., et al. (2017) · PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005568 · Cited by 785
Li, Y., Kamara, F., Zhou, G., Puthiyakunnon, S., Li, C., Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., Yao, L., Yan, G., & Chen, X.-G. (2014) · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003301 · Cited by 462
Alto, B. W., & Juliano, S. A. (2001) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1603/0022-2585-38.5.646 · Cited by 293
Shocket, M. S., Verwillow, A. B., Numazu, M. G., Slamani, H., Cohen, J. M., El Moustaid, F., Rohr, J., Johnson, L. R., & Mordecai, E. A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.58511 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Teng, H.-J., & Apperson, C. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-52
- ISSN
- 0022-2585 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2928
- OpenAlex
- W2112942243
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Survival of Immature Aedes albopictus and Aedes triseriatus(Diptera: Culicidae) in the Laboratory: Effects of Density, Food, and Competition on Response to Temperature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1603/0022-2585-37.1.40
- The paper
- Teng, H.-J., & Apperson, C. S. (2000). Development and Survival of Immature Aedes albopictus and Aedes triseriatus(Diptera: Culicidae) in the Laboratory: Effects of Density, Food, and Competition on Response to Temperature. Journal of Medical Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-37.1.40
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.