The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Convergent Habitat Segregation of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Southeastern Brazil and Florida
Abstract
During the rainy season of 2001, the incidence of the dengue vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus was examined in different habitats of two cities (Rio de Janeiro and Nova Iguaçu) in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, and in two cities (Palm Beach and Boca Raton) in Florida. Oviposition trap collections were performed in urban, suburban, and rural habitats in both areas. Our hypothesis that the abundances and frequencies of occurrence of Ae. aegypti and Ae albopictus are affected in opposite ways by increasing urbanization was only partially supported. City, habitat, and their interaction significantly affected the abundance of both species. Cities with high abundance of Ae. aegypti also had a high abundance of Ae. albopictus. The two species were most abundant in the cities of Rio de Janeiro state and the lowest in Boca Raton. Habitat had a significant but opposite effect on the abundances of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. In general, Ae. aegypti was most prevalent in highly urbanized areas and Ae. albopictus in rural, suburban, and vegetated urban areas in Rio de Janeiro state and Florida. However, abundances of the two species were similar in most suburban areas. Analyses of frequencies of occurrence showed an unexpected high level of co-occurrence of both species in the same oviposition trap. Despite the different geographical origins of Ae. albopictus in Brazil and the United States, the habitats used by this recent invader are remarkably similar in the two countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spread of The Tiger: Global Risk of Invasion by The Mosquito Aedes albopictus
Benedict, M. Q., Levine, R. S., Hawley, W. A., & Lounibos, L. P. (2007) · Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases · doi:10.1089/vbz.2006.0562 · Cited by 1,027
Self-citationThe Zika Virus Epidemic in Brazil: From Discovery to Future Implications
Lowe, R., Barcellos, C., Brasil, P., Cruz, O., Honório, N., Kuper, H., & Carvalho, M. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15010096 · Cited by 398
Self-citationMaciel-de-Freitas, R., Marques, W. A., Peres, R. C., Cunha, S. P., & Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R. (2007) · Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · doi:10.1590/s0074-02762007005000056 · Cited by 173
Self-citationMosquito production from four constructed treatment wetlands in peninsular Florida
REY, J. R., O'MEARA, G. F., O'CONNELL, S. M., & CUTWA-FRANCIS, M. M. (2006) · Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association · doi:10.2987/8756-971x(2006)22[198:mpffct]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Braks, M. A. H., Honório, N. A., Lourenço-De-Oliveira, R., Juliano, S. A., & Lounibos, L. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 785-794
- ISSN
- 0022-2585 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2173354879
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convergent Habitat Segregation of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Southeastern Brazil and Florida. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1603/0022-2585-40.6.785
- The paper
- Braks, M. A. H., Honório, N. A., Lourenço-De-Oliveira, R., Juliano, S. A., & Lounibos, L. P. (2003). Convergent Habitat Segregation of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Southeastern Brazil and Florida. Journal of Medical Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-40.6.785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.