The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Confidentiality in Direct Social-Work Practice: Inevitable Challenges and Ethical Dilemmas
Abstract
Social workers have long concerned themselves with confidentiality and its importance to practice. In 1922, social workers created their Code of Ethics, a major precept of which is the protection of confidentiality, defined as the regulation, both legal and ethical, that protects the client's rights of privacy. Social workers are confronting many ethical issues related to confidentiality, such as increasing demands for accountability, mandated duty-to-protect or -warn provisions, expanding court involvement in professional decision making, and widening access to information in records through the expanded use of computer technology. The objective of this study was to learn more about practitioners' ethical dilemmas in maintaining client confidentiality. A mailed, anonymous survey of experienced social-work practitioners was conducted to gain an understanding of how practitioners address confidentiality issues in their work with clients and to identify specific areas in which practitioners experience ethical dilemmas related to confidentiality, the factors contributing to these dilemmas, and the resources used by practitioners to resolve them. Major issues of practitioner concern and specific areas in which practitioners felt a need for more resources, education, and policy clarification were identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 32
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- Appelbaum P. S., 1984, Bulletin of the American Association of Psychiatry and the Law, 12, 109
- Appelbaum P. S., 1987, Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice.
- 10.1007/BF02251062 · DOI
- Bollas C., 1995, The new informants: The betrayal of confidentiality in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy.
- Corcoran K., 1996, Maneuvering the maze of managed care: Skills for mental health practitioners.
- 10.1093/sw/43.3.233 · DOI
- 10.1093/hsw/21.3.208 · DOI
- Dickson D., 1998, Confidentiality and privacy in social work.
- Fleck-Henderson A., 1991, Social Service Review, 65, 186
- Fortune A., 1999, Research in social work
- 10.1093/sw/44.3.243 · DOI
- 10.1606/1044-3894.1000 · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS12653J · DOI
- Holland T., 1991, Social Work, 36, 138
- 10.1037/0735-7028.9.3.458 · DOI
- 10.1300/J010v17n04_04 · DOI
- 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90055-H · DOI
- Landau R., Journal of Applied Social Sciences.
- 10.1097/00005053-198006000-00008 · DOI
- 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90343-4 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005053-198206000-00001 · DOI
- Lindenthal J. J., 1986, Ethical issues in epidemiologic research, 139
- 10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.572 · DOI
- 10.1093/sw/33.2.157 · DOI
- Loewenberg F., 1992, Ethical decisions for social work practice.
- McGuinn W., 1938, Boston College School of Social Work Studies, 1, 1
- 10.1037/0735-7028.16.3.375 · DOI
- 10.1080/00050069508258926 · DOI
- Miles M., 1994, Qualitative data analysis.
- 10.1037/0735-7028.17.1.15 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02190361 · DOI
- National Association of Social Workers, 1996, Code of ethics.
- 10.1037/0735-7028.25.2.154 · DOI
- Otto R., 1991, Forensic Reports, 4, 379
- 10.1177/001139282030002003 · DOI
- Petrila J., 1992, Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43, 136
- Reamer F., 1998, Ethical standards in social work: A critical review of the NASW Code of Ethics.
- 10.1093/sw/44.3.253 · DOI
- Rhodes M., 1986, Ethical dilemmas in social work.
- 10.1177/104438949207300105 · DOI
- Saakvitne K., 1994, Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 11, 181
- 10.1176/ps.48.1.35 · DOI
- Schmid D., 1983, Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 34, 353
- Shuman D., 1985, Southwestern Law Review, 39, 661
- 10.1037/0735-7028.24.2.153 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0079520 · DOI
- 10.1093/hsw/23.1.25 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01512.x · DOI
- Wilson S., 1978, Confidentiality in social work.
- Winslade W., 1985, Nebraska Law Review, 64, 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Millstein, K.
- Affiliations
- Simmons University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Millstein, Kathleen
- Venue
- Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 270-282
- ISSN
- 1044-3894 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-1350
- OpenAlex
- W2021725684
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- confidentiality, social work ethics, ethical dilemmas, client privacy, social workers, code of ethics, duty to warn, duty to protect, practitioner resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confidentiality in Direct Social-Work Practice: Inevitable Challenges and Ethical Dilemmas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1606/1044-3894.1018
- The paper
- Millstein, K. (2000). Confidentiality in Direct Social-Work Practice: Inevitable Challenges and Ethical Dilemmas. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.1018