Cited by 32Social Work Education and PracticeCounseling Practices and SupervisionEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Confidentiality in Direct Social-Work Practice: Inevitable Challenges and Ethical Dilemmas

Millstein, Kathleen·2000·Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services

Abstract

Social workers have long concerned themselves with confidentiality and its importance to practice. In 1922, social workers created their Code of Ethics, a major precept of which is the protection of confidentiality, defined as the regulation, both legal and ethical, that protects the client's rights of privacy. Social workers are confronting many ethical issues related to confidentiality, such as increasing demands for accountability, mandated duty-to-protect or -warn provisions, expanding court involvement in professional decision making, and widening access to information in records through the expanded use of computer technology. The objective of this study was to learn more about practitioners' ethical dilemmas in maintaining client confidentiality. A mailed, anonymous survey of experienced social-work practitioners was conducted to gain an understanding of how practitioners address confidentiality issues in their work with clients and to identify specific areas in which practitioners experience ethical dilemmas related to confidentiality, the factors contributing to these dilemmas, and the resources used by practitioners to resolve them. Major issues of practitioner concern and specific areas in which practitioners felt a need for more resources, education, and policy clarification were identified.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1606/1044-3894.1018

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 32

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Appelbaum P. S., 1984, Bulletin of the American Association of Psychiatry and the Law, 12, 109
  2. Appelbaum P. S., 1987, Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice.
  3. 10.1007/BF02251062 · DOI
  4. Bollas C., 1995, The new informants: The betrayal of confidentiality in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy.
  5. Corcoran K., 1996, Maneuvering the maze of managed care: Skills for mental health practitioners.
  6. 10.1093/sw/43.3.233 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/hsw/21.3.208 · DOI
  8. Dickson D., 1998, Confidentiality and privacy in social work.
  9. Fleck-Henderson A., 1991, Social Service Review, 65, 186
  10. Fortune A., 1999, Research in social work
  11. 10.1093/sw/44.3.243 · DOI
  12. 10.1606/1044-3894.1000 · DOI
  13. 10.1520/JFS12653J · DOI
  14. Holland T., 1991, Social Work, 36, 138
  15. 10.1037/0735-7028.9.3.458 · DOI
  16. 10.1300/J010v17n04_04 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90055-H · DOI
  18. Landau R., Journal of Applied Social Sciences.
  19. 10.1097/00005053-198006000-00008 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90343-4 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/00005053-198206000-00001 · DOI
  22. Lindenthal J. J., 1986, Ethical issues in epidemiologic research, 139
  23. 10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.572 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/sw/33.2.157 · DOI
  25. Loewenberg F., 1992, Ethical decisions for social work practice.
  26. McGuinn W., 1938, Boston College School of Social Work Studies, 1, 1
  27. 10.1037/0735-7028.16.3.375 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/00050069508258926 · DOI
  29. Miles M., 1994, Qualitative data analysis.
  30. 10.1037/0735-7028.17.1.15 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/BF02190361 · DOI
  32. National Association of Social Workers, 1996, Code of ethics.
  33. 10.1037/0735-7028.25.2.154 · DOI
  34. Otto R., 1991, Forensic Reports, 4, 379
  35. 10.1177/001139282030002003 · DOI
  36. Petrila J., 1992, Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43, 136
  37. Reamer F., 1998, Ethical standards in social work: A critical review of the NASW Code of Ethics.
  38. 10.1093/sw/44.3.253 · DOI
  39. Rhodes M., 1986, Ethical dilemmas in social work.
  40. 10.1177/104438949207300105 · DOI
  41. Saakvitne K., 1994, Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 11, 181
  42. 10.1176/ps.48.1.35 · DOI
  43. Schmid D., 1983, Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 34, 353
  44. Shuman D., 1985, Southwestern Law Review, 39, 661
  45. 10.1037/0735-7028.24.2.153 · DOI
  46. 10.1037/h0079520 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/hsw/23.1.25 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01512.x · DOI
  49. Wilson S., 1978, Confidentiality in social work.
  50. Winslade W., 1985, Nebraska Law Review, 64, 678

Metadata

Authors
Millstein, K.
Affiliations
Simmons University (US)
Corresponding author
Millstein, Kathleen
Venue
Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services
Published
2000-06
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
270-282
ISSN
  • 1044-3894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-1350
OpenAlex
W2021725684
Cited by
32
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
confidentiality, social work ethics, ethical dilemmas, client privacy, social workers, code of ethics, duty to warn, duty to protect, practitioner resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confidentiality in Direct Social-Work Practice: Inevitable Challenges and Ethical Dilemmas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1606/1044-3894.1018
The paper
Millstein, K. (2000). Confidentiality in Direct Social-Work Practice: Inevitable Challenges and Ethical Dilemmas. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.1018