The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative Filtering Meets Mobile Recommendation: A User-Centered Approach
Open accessAbstract
With the increasing popularity of location tracking services such as GPS, more and more mobile data are being accumulated. Based on such data, a potentially useful service is to make timely and targeted recommendations for users on places where they might be interested to go and activities that they are likely to conduct. For example, a user arriving in Beijing might wonder where to visit and what she can do around the Forbidden City. A key challenge for such recommendation problems is that the data we have on each individual user might be very limited, while to make useful and accurate recommendations, we need extensive annotated location and activity information from user trace data. In this paper, we present a new approach, known as user-centered collaborative location and activity filtering (UCLAF), to pull many users’ data together and apply collaborative filtering to find like-minded users and like-patterned activities at different locations. We model the userlocation- activity relations with a tensor representation, and propose a regularized tensor and matrix decomposition solution which can better address the sparse data problem in mobile information retrieval. We empirically evaluate UCLAF using a real-world GPS dataset collected from 164 users over 2.5 years, and showed that our system can outperform several state-of-the-art solutions to the problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fine-Grained Activity Recognition by Aggregating Abstract Object Usage
Patterson, D. J., Fox, D., Kautz, H., & Philipose, M. (2005) · Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'05) · doi:10.1109/iswc.2005.22 · Cited by 452
Cited by
Urban Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications
Zheng, Y., Capra, L., Wolfson, O., & Yang, H. (2014) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/2629592 · Cited by 1,507
Self-citationExploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation
Ye, M., Yin, P., Lee, W.-C., & Lee, D.-L. (2011) · Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/2009916.2009962 · Cited by 1,111
Methodologies for Cross-Domain Data Fusion: An Overview
Zheng, Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2015.2465959 · Cited by 454
Self-citationExploiting Geographical Neighborhood Characteristics for Location Recommendation
Liu, Y., Wei, W., Sun, A., & Miao, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/2661829.2662002 · Cited by 345
Rank-GeoFM: A Ranking based Geographical Factorization Method for Point of Interest Recommendation
Li, X., Cong, G., Li, X.-L., Pham, T.-A. N., & Krishnaswamy, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/2766462.2767722 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, V., Cao, B., Zheng, Y., Xie, X., & Yang, Q.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2010-07-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 236-241
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2117587045
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaborative Filtering Meets Mobile Recommendation: A User-Centered Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7577
- The paper
- Zheng, V., Cao, B., Zheng, Y., Xie, X., & Yang, Q. (2010). Collaborative Filtering Meets Mobile Recommendation: A User-Centered Approach. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.