The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks for Text Classification
Open accessAbstract
Text classification is a foundational task in many NLP applications. Traditional text classifiers often rely on many human-designed features, such as dictionaries, knowledge bases and special tree kernels. In contrast to traditional methods, we introduce a recurrent convolutional neural network for text classification without human-designed features. In our model, we apply a recurrent structure to capture contextual information as far as possible when learning word representations, which may introduce considerably less noise compared to traditional window-based neural networks. We also employ a max-pooling layer that automatically judges which words play key roles in text classification to capture the key components in texts. We conduct experiments on four commonly used datasets. The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on several datasets, particularly on document-level datasets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Feature selection, L 1 vs. L 2 regularization, and rotational invariance
Ng, A. Y. (2004) · Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04 · doi:10.1145/1015330.1015435 · Cited by 1,572
Learning Accurate, Compact, and Interpretable Tree Annotation
Petrov, S., Barrett, L., Thibaux, R., & Klein, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the ACL - ACL '06 · doi:10.3115/1220175.1220230 · Cited by 793
Cited by
TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning
Arik, S. Ö., & Pfister, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826 · Cited by 1,771
Object detection using YOLO: challenges, architectural successors, datasets and applications
Diwan, T., Anirudh, G., & Tembhurne, J. V. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13644-y · Cited by 1,549
“…[37], character recognition [83], intrusion detection [32], automatic landslide detection [48], time series prediction [8], text classification [33], gene expression [51], micro-blogs [82], biological data handling [38], unstructured text data mining with fault classification [75], video…”
BackgroundA Survey of Optimization Methods From a Machine Learning Perspective
Sun, S., Cao, Z., Zhu, H., & Zhao, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2019.2950779 · Cited by 789
Self-citationDeep Learning for Extreme Multi-label Text Classification
Liu, J., Chang, W.-C., Wu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3077136.3080834 · Cited by 676
A Joint Many-Task Model: Growing a Neural Network for Multiple NLP Tasks
Hashimoto, K., xiong, C., Tsuruoka, Y., & Socher, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1206 · Cited by 535
Metadata
- Authors
- Lai, S., Xu, L., Liu, K., & Zhao, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2015-02-19
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2265846598
- Cited by
- 2,280
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 70.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks for Text Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9513
- The paper
- Lai, S., Xu, L., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2015). Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks for Text Classification. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9513
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.