Cited by 345Machine Learning in HealthcareRecommender Systems and TechniquesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

GAMENet: Graph Augmented MEmory Networks for Recommending Medication Combination

Open access
Shang, Junyuan, Xiao, Cao, Ma, Tengfei, Li, Hongyan, Sun, Jimeng·2019·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Recent progress in deep learning is revolutionizing the healthcare domain including providing solutions to medication recommendations, especially recommending medication combination for patients with complex health conditions. Existing approaches either do not customize based on patient health history, or ignore existing knowledge on drug-drug interactions (DDI) that might lead to adverse outcomes. To fill this gap, we propose the Graph Augmented Memory Networks (GAMENet), which integrates the drug-drug interactions knowledge graph by a memory module implemented as a graph convolutional networks, and models longitudinal patient records as the query. It is trained end-to-end to provide safe and personalized recommendation of medication combination. We demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of GAMENet by comparing with several state-of-the-art methods on real EHR data. GAMENet outperformed all baselines in all effectiveness measures, and also achieved 3.60% DDI rate reduction from existing EHR data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011126

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods that embed medical entities including EHRs and medical ontologies leverage the inherently hierarchical structure in the medical concepts KG.

    “Methods that embed medical entities, including EHRs and medical ontologies, leverage the inherently hierarchical structure in the medical concepts KG [201].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [201]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 345

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Kirkpatrick, S.; Gelatt, C. D.; and Vecchi, M. P. 1983. Op- timization by simulated annealing. science 220(4598):671- 680.
  2. Sukhbaatar, S.; Weston, J.; Fergus, R.; et al. 2015. End-to- end memory networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 2440-2448.
  3. Tatonetti, N.; Patrick, P.; Daneshjou, R.; and Altman, R. 2012a. Data-driven prediction of drug effects and inter- actions. Science translational medicine 4(125):125ra31- 125ra31.
  4. Weston, J.; Chopra, S.; and Bordes, A. 2015. Memory net- works. In International Conference on Learning Represen- tations.
  5. Zhang, Y.; Chen, R.; Tang, J.; Stewart, W. F.; and Sun, J. 2017. Leap: Learning to prescribe effective and safe treatment combinations for multimorbidity. In Proceed- ings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1315-1324. ACM.
  6. Zitnik, M.; Agrawal, M.; and Leskovec, J. 2018. Model- ing polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional net- works. Bioinformatics 34(13):457-466.

Authors
Shang, J., Xiao, C., Ma, T., Li, H., & Sun, J.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2019-07-17
Volume
33
Issue
01
Pages
1126-1133
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2964068143
Cited by
345
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 4
FWCI
11.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1418511, 1533768)
  • Peking University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
drug-drug interactions, knowledge graphs, memory networks, graph convolutional networks, personalized recommendation, electronic health records, longitudinal patient records, drug safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review