Learning phenotypes and dynamic patient representations via RNN regularized collective non-negative tensor factorization
Open accessAbstract
Non-negative Tensor Factorization (NTF) has been shown effective to discover clinically relevant and interpretable phenotypes from Electronic Health Records (EHR). Existing NTF based computational phenotyping models aggregate data over the observation window, resulting in the learned phenotypes being mixtures of disease states appearing at different times. We argue that by separating the clinical events happening at different times in the input tensor, the temporal dynamics and the disease progression within the observation window could be modeled and the learned phenotypes will correspond to more specific disease states. Yet how to construct the tensor for data samples with different temporal lengths and properly capture the temporal relationship specific to each individual data sample remains an open challenge. In this paper, we propose a novel Collective Non-negative Tensor Factorization (CNTF) model where each patient is represented by a temporal tensor, and all of the temporal tensors are factorized collectively with the phenotype definitions being shared across all patients. The proposed CNTF model is also flexible to incorporate non-temporal data modality and RNN-based temporal regularization. We validate the proposed model using MIMIC-III dataset, and the empirical results show that the learned phenotypes are clinically interpretable. Moreover, the proposed CNTF model outperforms the state-of-the-art computational phenotyping models for the mortality prediction task.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among 37 studies learning from structured codes, the frequency of a given code was used in 5 studies.
“Among 37 studies learning from structured codes, the majority (n = 27) generate one-hot vectors for the input data, and the frequency of a given code is used in 5 studies [11,48,58–60].”
From Deep representation learning of patient data from Electronic Health Records (EHR): A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Ho, J. C.; Ghosh, J.; and Sun, J. 2014. Marble: high-throughput phenotyping from electronic health records via sparse nonnegative tensor factorization. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD In- ternational Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 115-124. ACM.
- Hochreiter, S., and Schmidhuber, J. 1997. Long short-term mem- ory. Neural Computation 9(8):1735-1780.
- Kim, Y.; El-Kareh, R.; Sun, J.; Yu, H.; and Jiang, X. 2017. Dis- criminative and distinct phenotyping by constrained tensor factor- ization. Scientific Reports 7(1):1114.
- Wang, Y.; Chen, R.; Ghosh, J.; Denny, J. C.; Kho, A.; Chen, Y.; Malin, B. A.; and Sun, J. 2015. Rubik: Knowledge guided ten- sor factorization and completion for health data analytics. In Pro- ceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1265-1274. ACM.
- Authors
- Yin, K., Qian, D., Cheung, W. K., Fung, B. C. M., & Poon, J.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
- McGill University (CA)
- Hospital Authority (HK)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2019-07-17
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 1246-1253
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2904119616
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.aaai.org/ (unspecified)
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Computational Mathematics › Tensor decomposition and applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- computational phenotyping, nonnegative tensor factorization, recurrent neural networks, temporal regularization, electronic health records, patient representation, temporal dynamics, disease progression, mortality prediction, MIMIC-III
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review