Cited by 19Machine Learning in HealthcareTensor decomposition and applicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Learning phenotypes and dynamic patient representations via RNN regularized collective non-negative tensor factorization

Open access
Yin, Kejing, Qian, Dong, Cheung, William K., Fung, Benjamin C. M., Poon, Jonathan·2019·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Non-negative Tensor Factorization (NTF) has been shown effective to discover clinically relevant and interpretable phenotypes from Electronic Health Records (EHR). Existing NTF based computational phenotyping models aggregate data over the observation window, resulting in the learned phenotypes being mixtures of disease states appearing at different times. We argue that by separating the clinical events happening at different times in the input tensor, the temporal dynamics and the disease progression within the observation window could be modeled and the learned phenotypes will correspond to more specific disease states. Yet how to construct the tensor for data samples with different temporal lengths and properly capture the temporal relationship specific to each individual data sample remains an open challenge. In this paper, we propose a novel Collective Non-negative Tensor Factorization (CNTF) model where each patient is represented by a temporal tensor, and all of the temporal tensors are factorized collectively with the phenotype definitions being shared across all patients. The proposed CNTF model is also flexible to incorporate non-temporal data modality and RNN-based temporal regularization. We validate the proposed model using MIMIC-III dataset, and the empirical results show that the learned phenotypes are clinically interpretable. Moreover, the proposed CNTF model outperforms the state-of-the-art computational phenotyping models for the mortality prediction task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011246

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 19

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ho, J. C.; Ghosh, J.; and Sun, J. 2014. Marble: high-throughput phenotyping from electronic health records via sparse nonnegative tensor factorization. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD In- ternational Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 115-124. ACM.
  2. Hochreiter, S., and Schmidhuber, J. 1997. Long short-term mem- ory. Neural Computation 9(8):1735-1780.
  3. Kim, Y.; El-Kareh, R.; Sun, J.; Yu, H.; and Jiang, X. 2017. Dis- criminative and distinct phenotyping by constrained tensor factor- ization. Scientific Reports 7(1):1114.
  4. Wang, Y.; Chen, R.; Ghosh, J.; Denny, J. C.; Kho, A.; Chen, Y.; Malin, B. A.; and Sun, J. 2015. Rubik: Knowledge guided ten- sor factorization and completion for health data analytics. In Pro- ceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1265-1274. ACM.

Authors
Yin, K., Qian, D., Cheung, W. K., Fung, B. C. M., & Poon, J.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Hospital Authority (HK)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2019-07-17
Volume
33
Issue
01
Pages
1246-1253
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2904119616
Cited by
19
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Computational Mathematics › Tensor decomposition and applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
computational phenotyping, nonnegative tensor factorization, recurrent neural networks, temporal regularization, electronic health records, patient representation, temporal dynamics, disease progression, mortality prediction, MIMIC-III

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review