The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GaitSet: Regarding Gait as a Set for Cross-View Gait Recognition
Open accessAbstract
As a unique biometric feature that can be recognized at a distance, gait has broad applications in crime prevention, forensic identification and social security. To portray a gait, existing gait recognition methods utilize either a gait template, where temporal information is hard to preserve, or a gait sequence, which must keep unnecessary sequential constraints and thus loses the flexibility of gait recognition. In this paper we present a novel perspective, where a gait is regarded as a set consisting of independent frames. We propose a new network named GaitSet to learn identity information from the set. Based on the set perspective, our method is immune to permutation of frames, and can naturally integrate frames from different videos which have been filmed under different scenarios, such as diverse viewing angles, different clothes/carrying conditions. Experiments show that under normal walking conditions, our single-model method achieves an average rank-1 accuracy of 95.0% on the CASIA-B gait dataset and an 87.1% accuracy on the OU-MVLP gait dataset. These results represent new state-of-the-art recognition accuracy. On various complex scenarios, our model exhibits a significant level of robustness. It achieves accuracies of 87.2% and 70.4% on CASIA-B under bag-carrying and coat-wearing walking conditions, respectively. These outperform the existing best methods by a large margin. The method presented can also achieve a satisfactory accuracy with a small number of frames in a test sample, e.g., 82.5% on CASIA-B with only 7 frames. The source code has been released at https://github.com/AbnerHqC/GaitSet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Wang, X., Girshick, R., Gupta, A., & He, K. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00813 · Cited by 11,596
Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs
Hamilton, W. L., Ying, R., & Leskovec, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02216 · Cited by 10,639
PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation
Charles, R. Q., Su, H., Kaichun, M., & Guibas, L. J. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.16 · Cited by 9,237
Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attention
Xu, K., Ba, J., Kiros, R., Cho, K., Courville, A., Salakhutdinov, R., Zemel, R., & Bengio, Y. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03044 · Cited by 8,248
Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Clouds
Wang, Y., Sun, Y., Liu, Z., Sarma, S. E., Bronstein, M. M., & Solomon, J. M. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/3326362 · Cited by 7,199
Targeted Branching for the Maximum Independent Set Problem Using Graph Neural Networks
Silva, G., Rodrigues, M., Teixeira, A., & Amorim, M. (2024) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.sea.2024.20 · Cited by 5,183
VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detection
Zhou, Y., & Tuzel, O. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00472 · Cited by 4,813
In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identification
Hermans, A., Beyer, L., & Leibe, B. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.07737 · Cited by 2,687
PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Space
Qi, C. R., Yi, L., Su, H., & Guibas, L. J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02413 · Cited by 2,114
Cited by
Robust Cross-View Gait Recognition with Evidence: A Discriminant Gait GAN (DiGGAN) Approach
Hu, B., Guan, Y., Gao, Y., Long, Y., Lane, N., & Ploetz, T. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.10493 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Chao, H., He, Y., Zhang, J., & Feng, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2019-07-17
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 8126-8133
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2963301258
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 128.98
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GaitSet: Regarding Gait as a Set for Cross-View Gait Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33018126
- The paper
- Chao, H., He, Y., Zhang, J., & Feng, J. (2019). GaitSet: Regarding Gait as a Set for Cross-View Gait Recognition. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33018126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.