Cited by 37Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic ModelingHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques

ManyModalQA: Modality Disambiguation and QA over Diverse Inputs

Open access
Hannan, Darryl, Jain, Akshay, Bansal, Mohit·2020·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

We present a new multimodal question answering challenge, ManyModalQA, in which an agent must answer a question by considering three distinct modalities: text, images, and tables. We collect our data by scraping Wikipedia and then utilize crowdsourcing to collect question-answer pairs. Our questions are ambiguous, in that the modality that contains the answer is not easily determined based solely upon the question. To demonstrate this ambiguity, we construct a modality selector (or disambiguator) network, and this model gets substantially lower accuracy on our challenge set, compared to existing datasets, indicating that our questions are more ambiguous. By analyzing this model, we investigate which words in the question are indicative of the modality. Next, we construct a simple baseline ManyModalQA model, which, based on the prediction from the modality selector, fires a corresponding pre-trained state-of-the-art unimodal QA model. We focus on providing the community with a new manymodal evaluation set and only provide a fine-tuning set, with the expectation that existing datasets and approaches will be transferred for most of the training, to encourage low-resource generalization without large, monolithic training sets for each new task. There is a significant gap between our baseline models and human performance; therefore, we hope that this challenge encourages research in end-to-end modality disambiguation and multimodal QA models, as well as transfer learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6294

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MULTIBENCH currently does not include several important research areas outside of multimodal fusion, such as question answering, retrieval, grounding, and reinforcement learning.

    “While MULTIBENCH currently does not include several important research areas outside of multimodal fusion (e.g., question answering [4, 63], retrieval [187], grounding [32], and reinforcement learning [110]), and is also limited by the models and metrics it supports, we outline our plan to expand in these directions in Appendix I.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Anderson, P.; He, X.; Buehler, C.; Teney, D.; Johnson, M.; Gould, S.; and Zhang, L. 2018. Bottom-up and top-down attention for image captioning and visual question answering. In CVPR .
  2. Antol, S.; Agrawal, A.; Lu, J.; Mitchell, M.; Batra, D.; Zitnick, C. L.; and Parikh, D. 2015. VQA: Visual Question Answering. In ICCV .
  3. Cer, D.; Yang, Y.; Kong, S.; Hua, N.; Limtiaco, N.; John, R. S.; Constant, N.; Guajardo-Cespedes, M.; Yuan, S.; Tar, C.; Sung, Y.; Strope, B.; and Kurzweil, R. 2018. Universal sentence encoder. CoRR abs/1803.11175. · arXiv
  4. Das, A.; Kottur, S.; Gupta, K.; Singh, A.; Yadav, D.; Moura, J. M.; Parikh, D.; and Batra, D. 2017. Visual Dialog. In CVPR .
  5. Devlin, J.; Chang, M.-W.; Lee, K.; and Toutanova, K. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In NAACL-HLT .
  6. Dunn, M.; Sagun, L.; Higgins, M.; Guney, V. U.; Cirik, V.; and Cho, K. 2017. Searchqa: A new q&a dataset augmented with context from a search engine. CoRR abs/1704.05179. · arXiv
  7. Goyal, Y.; Khot, T.; Summers-Stay, D.; Batra, D.; and Parikh, D. 2017. Making the V in VQA matter: Elevating the role of image understanding in Visual Question Answering. In CVPR .
  8. Hermann, K. M.; Kocisk´ y, T.; Grefenstette, E.; Espeholt, L.; Kay, W.; Suleyman, M.; and Blunsom, P. 2015. Teaching machines to read and comprehend. In NeurIPS .
  9. Jauhar, S. K.; Turney, P. D.; and Hovy, E. H. 2016. Tables as semi-structured knowledge for question answering. In ACL .
  10. Johnson, J.; Hariharan, B.; van der Maaten, L.; Fei-Fei, L.; Zitnick, C. L.; and Girshick, R. B. 2017. Clevr: A diagnostic dataset for compositional language and elementary visual reasoning. In CVPR .
  11. Kafle, K.; Cohen, S.; Price, B. L.; and Kanan, C. 2018. Dvqa: Understanding data visualizations via question answering. In CVPR .
  12. Lin, T.-Y.; Maire, M.; Belongie, S. J.; Bourdev, L. D.; Girshick, R. B.; Hays, J.; Perona, P.; Ramanan, D.; Doll´ ar, P.; and Zitnick, C. L. 2014. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In ECCV .
  13. Liu, Y.; Ott, M.; Goyal, N.; Du, J.; Joshi, M.; Chen, D.; Levy, O.; Lewis, M.; Zettlemoyer, L. S.; and Stoyanov, V. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. ArXiv abs/1907.11692. · arXiv
  14. Logan, I. R. L.; Humeau, S.; and Singh, S. 2017. Multimodal attribute extraction. In CoRR , volume abs/1711.11118. · arXiv
  15. Maharaj, T.; Ballas, N.; Courville, A. C.; and Pal, C. J. 2017. A dataset and exploration of models for understanding video data through fill-in-the-blank question-answering. In CVPR .
  16. Nguyen, T.; Rosenberg, M.; Song, X.; Gao, J.; Tiwary, S.; Majumder, R.; and Deng, L. 2016. Ms marco: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. In NeurIPS .
  17. Pasupat, P., and Liang, P. 2015. Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables. In ACL .
  18. Pennington, J.; Socher, R.; and Manning, C. D. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In EMNLP .
  19. Rajpurkar, P.; Zhang, J.; Lopyrev, K.; and Liang, P. 2016. Squad: 100, 000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In EMNLP .
  20. Rajpurkar, P.; Jia, R.; and Liang, P. 2018. Know what you don't know: Unanswerable questions for squad. In ACL .
  21. Reddy, S.; Chen, D.; and Manning, C. D. 2018. Coqa: A conversational question answering challenge. TACL 7:249-266.
  22. Ribeiro, M. T.; Singh, S.; and Guestrin, C. 2016. 'why should I trust you?': Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In KDD .
  23. Rohrbach, A.; Rohrbach, M.; Tandon, N.; and Schiele, B. 2015. A dataset for movie description. In CVPR .
  24. See, A.; Liu, P. J.; and Manning, C. D. 2017. Get to the point: Summarization with pointer-generator networks. In ACL .
  25. Tan, H., and Bansal, M. 2019. Lxmert: Learning cross-modality encoder representations from transformers. In EMNLP .
  26. Welbl, J.; Stenetorp, P.; and Riedel, S. 2018. Constructing datasets for multi-hop reading comprehension across documents. In ACL .
  27. Yagcioglu, S.; Erdem, A.; Erdem, E.; and Ikizler-Cinbis, N. 2018. Recipeqa: A challenge dataset for multimodal comprehension of cooking recipes. In EMNLP .
  28. Yang, Z.; Qi, P.; Zhang, S.; Bengio, Y.; Cohen, W. W.; Salakhutdinov, R.; and Manning, C. D. 2018. HotpotQA: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering. In EMNLP .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hannan, D., Jain, A., & Bansal, M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2020-04-03
Volume
34
Issue
05
Pages
7879-7886
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2998536339
Cited by
37
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-19-2-4031, N66001-19)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Keywords
multimodal question answering, question ambiguity, transfer learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review