Semantics-Aware BERT for Language Understanding
Open accessAbstract
The latest work on language representations carefully integrates contextualized features into language model training, which enables a series of success especially in various machine reading comprehension and natural language inference tasks. However, the existing language representation models including ELMo, GPT and BERT only exploit plain context-sensitive features such as character or word embeddings. They rarely consider incorporating structured semantic information which can provide rich semantics for language representation. To promote natural language understanding, we propose to incorporate explicit contextual semantics from pre-trained semantic role labeling, and introduce an improved language representation model, Semantics-aware BERT (SemBERT), which is capable of explicitly absorbing contextual semantics over a BERT backbone. SemBERT keeps the convenient usability of its BERT precursor in a light fine-tuning way without substantial task-specific modifications. Compared with BERT, semantics-aware BERT is as simple in concept but more powerful. It obtains new state-of-the-art or substantially improves results on ten reading comprehension and language inference tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During pretraining, next-word prediction over massive corpora gives LLMs a strong understanding of language, powerful contextual reasoning, and world knowledge.
“During pretraining, the model is trained with next-word prediction over massive corpora of textual data. This gives the model a strong understanding of language (Jawahar et al., 2019; Raffel et al., 2020), powerful contextual reasoning (Zhang et al., 2020), as well as world knowledge (Liusie et al., 2023).”
From SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 364
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Zhao, H., Li, Z., Zhang, S., Zhou, X., & Zhou, X.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Cloudwalk (China) (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2020-04-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 9628-9635
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2998230451
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 26.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.aaai.org/ (unspecified)
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1836222, 61733011, 2017YFB0304100)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFB0304100, 2017YFB0304100)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- BERT, semantic role labeling, contextual semantics, natural language understanding, machine reading comprehension, natural language inference, fine-tuning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review