Cited by 364Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Semantics-Aware BERT for Language Understanding

Open access
Zhang, Zhuosheng, Wu, Yuwei, Zhao, Hai, Li, Zuchao, Zhang, Shuailiang, Zhou, Xi, Zhou, Xiang·2020·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The latest work on language representations carefully integrates contextualized features into language model training, which enables a series of success especially in various machine reading comprehension and natural language inference tasks. However, the existing language representation models including ELMo, GPT and BERT only exploit plain context-sensitive features such as character or word embeddings. They rarely consider incorporating structured semantic information which can provide rich semantics for language representation. To promote natural language understanding, we propose to incorporate explicit contextual semantics from pre-trained semantic role labeling, and introduce an improved language representation model, Semantics-aware BERT (SemBERT), which is capable of explicitly absorbing contextual semantics over a BERT backbone. SemBERT keeps the convenient usability of its BERT precursor in a light fine-tuning way without substantial task-specific modifications. Compared with BERT, semantics-aware BERT is as simple in concept but more powerful. It obtains new state-of-the-art or substantially improves results on ten reading comprehension and language inference tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6510

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During pretraining, next-word prediction over massive corpora gives LLMs a strong understanding of language, powerful contextual reasoning, and world knowledge.

    “During pretraining, the model is trained with next-word prediction over massive corpora of textual data. This gives the model a strong understanding of language (Jawahar et al., 2019; Raffel et al., 2020), powerful contextual reasoning (Zhang et al., 2020), as well as world knowledge (Liusie et al., 2023).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 364

Authors
Zhang, Z., Wu, Y., Zhao, H., Li, Z., Zhang, S., Zhou, X., & Zhou, X.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Cloudwalk (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2020-04-03
Volume
34
Issue
05
Pages
9628-9635
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2998230451
Cited by
364
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 9
FWCI
26.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1836222, 61733011, 2017YFB0304100)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFB0304100, 2017YFB0304100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
BERT, semantic role labeling, contextual semantics, natural language understanding, machine reading comprehension, natural language inference, fine-tuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review