Cited by 5Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyMachine Learning and Algorithms

Teaching Humans When to Defer to a Classifier via Exemplars

Open access
Mozannar, Hussein, Satyanarayan, Arvind, Sontag, David·2022·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Expert decision makers are starting to rely on data-driven automated agents to assist them with various tasks. For this collaboration to perform properly, the human decision maker must have a mental model of when and when not to rely on the agent. In this work, we aim to ensure that human decision makers learn a valid mental model of the agent's strengths and weaknesses. To accomplish this goal, we propose an exemplar-based teaching strategy where humans solve a set of selected examples and with our help generalize from them to the domain. We present a novel parameterization of the human's mental model of the AI that applies a nearest neighbor rule in local regions surrounding the teaching examples. Using this model, we derive a near-optimal strategy for selecting a representative teaching set. We validate the benefits of our teaching strategy on a multi-hop question answering task with an interpretable AI model using crowd workers. We find that when workers draw the right lessons from the teaching stage, their task performance improves. We furthermore validate our method on a set of synthetic experiments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20469

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Requiring the programmer to ask for suggestions may lead to sub-optimal interactions because its success would rely on programmers having an accurate mental model of Copilot abilities, which can require long-term interactions with the model or training.

    “Requiring the programmer to ask may lead to sub-optimal interactions because its success would rely on programmers having an accurate mental model of Copilot abilities (Sarkar et al. 2022) which can require long-term interactions with the model (Bansal et al. 2019) or training (Mozannar, Satyanarayan, and Sontag 2022).”

    From When to Show a Suggestion? Integrating Human Feedback in AI-Assisted Programming (2024) · cites this paper as Mozannar, Satyanarayan, and Sontag 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 5

Authors
Mozannar, H., Satyanarayan, A., & Sontag, D.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2022-06-28
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
5323-5331
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W4226161957
Cited by
5
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1723344)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
human-AI collaboration, nearest neighbor rule, multi-hop question answering, explainable AI, crowd workers, trust in AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review