The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incremental-DETR: Incremental Few-Shot Object Detection via Self-Supervised Learning
Open accessAbstract
Incremental few-shot object detection aims at detecting novel classes without forgetting knowledge of the base classes with only a few labeled training data from the novel classes. Most related prior works are on incremental object detection that rely on the availability of abundant training samples per novel class that substantially limits the scalability to real-world setting where novel data can be scarce. In this paper, we propose the Incremental-DETR that does incremental few-shot object detection via fine-tuning and self-supervised learning on the DETR object detector. To alleviate severe over-fitting with few novel class data, we first fine-tune the class-specific components of DETR with self-supervision from additional object proposals generated using Selective Search as pseudo labels. We further introduce an incremental few-shot fine-tuning strategy with knowledge distillation on the class-specific components of DETR to encourage the network in detecting novel classes without forgetting the base classes. Extensive experiments conducted on standard incremental object detection and incremental few-shot object detection settings show that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin. Our source code is available at https://github.com/dongnana777/Incremental-DETR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The reason is that anchor-free frameworks can effectively handle incremental classes without defining anchor boxes.”
From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [100]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939
End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., & Zagoruyko, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 · Cited by 18,285
Catastrophic Interference in Connectionist Networks: The Sequential Learning Problem
McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60536-8 · Cited by 3,770
Incremental Learning of Object Detectors without Catastrophic Forgetting
Shmelkov, K., Schmid, C., & Alahari, K. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.368 · Cited by 559
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Everingham, M.; Van Gool, L.; Williams, C. K.; Winn, J.; and Zisserman, A. 2010. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. International journal of computer vision, 88(2): 303-338.
- Ganea, D. A.; Boom, B.; and Poppe, R. 2021. Incremen- tal Few-Shot Instance Segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1185-1194.
- Girshick, R. 2015. Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 1440-1448.
- Girshick, R.; Donahue, J.; Darrell, T.; and Malik, J. 2014a. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and se- mantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 580-587.
- Girshick, R.; Donahue, J.; Darrell, T.; and Malik, J. 2014b. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and se- mantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 580-587.
- Hinton, G.; Vinyals, O.; Dean, J.; et al. 2015. Distill- ing the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2(7). · arXiv
- Kj, J.; Rajasegaran, J.; Khan, S.; Khan, F. S.; and Balasub- ramanian, V. N. 2021. Incremental Object Detection via Meta-Learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
- Kuhn, H. W. 1955. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval research logistics quarterly, 2(1-2): 83-97.
- Lin, T.-Y.; Goyal, P.; Girshick, R.; He, K.; and Dollár, P. 2017b. Focal loss for dense object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2980-2988.
- Lin, T.-Y.; Maire, M.; Belongie, S.; Hays, J.; Perona, P.; Ramanan, D.; Dollár, P.; and Zitnick, C. L. 2014. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European conference on computer vision, 740-755. Springer.
- Liu, W.; Anguelov, D.; Erhan, D.; Szegedy, C.; Reed, S.; Fu, C. Y.; and Berg, A. C. 2016. SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. In European Conference on Computer Vision.
- Perez-Rua, J.-M.; Zhu, X.; Hospedales, T. M.; and Xiang, T. 2020. Incremental Few-Shot Object Detection. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 13846-13855.
- Ratcliff, R. 1990. Connectionist models of recognition mem- ory: constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological review, 97(2): 285.
- Rezatofighi, H.; Tsoi, N.; Gwak, J.; Sadeghian, A.; Reid, I.; and Savarese, S. 2019. Generalized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 658-666.
- Sun, B.; Li, B.; Cai, S.; Yuan, Y.; and Zhang, C. 2021. FSCE: Few-shot object detection via contrastive proposal encoding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 7352-7362.
- Uijlings, J. R.; Van De Sande, K. E.; Gevers, T.; and Smeul- ders, A. W. 2013. Selective search for object recognition. International journal of computer vision, 104(2): 154-171.
- Wang, X.; Huang, T. E.; Darrell, T.; Gonzalez, J. E.; and Yu, F. 2020. Frustratingly simple few-shot object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.06957. · arXiv
- Wang, Y.-X.; Ramanan, D.; and Hebert, M. 2019. Meta- learning to detect rare objects. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 9925-9934.
- Wu, J.; Liu, S.; Huang, D.; and Wang, Y. 2020. Multi- scale positive sample refinement for few-shot object detec- tion. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 456-472.
- Wu, X.; Sahoo, D.; and Hoi, S. 2020. Meta-RCNN: Meta learning for few-shot object detection. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 1679- 1687.
- Zhang, G.; Luo, Z.; Cui, K.; and Lu, S. 2021. Meta-detr: Few- shot object detection via unified image-level meta-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.11731, 2. · arXiv
- Zhou, X.; Wang, D.; and Krähenbühl, P. 2019. Objects as points. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.07850. · arXiv
- Zhu, X.; Su, W.; Lu, L.; Li, B.; Wang, X.; and Dai, J. 2020. Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04159. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey
Zhang, J., Liu, L., Silvén, O., Pietikäinen, M., & Hu, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3529038 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, N., Zhang, Y., Ding, M., & Lee, G. H.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2023-06-26
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 543-551
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 2374-3468
- OpenAlex
- W4382462248
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation (AISG2-RP-2020-016)
- National Research Foundation Singapore (AISG2-RP-2020-016), AISG Award No: AISG2-RP-2020-016)
- Ministry of Education, India
- China Scholarship Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- self-supervised learning, DETR, knowledge distillation, selective search, pseudo-labeling, catastrophic forgetting, novel class detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review