Cited by 62Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incremental-DETR: Incremental Few-Shot Object Detection via Self-Supervised Learning

Open access
Dong, Na, Zhang, Yongqiang, Ding, Mingli, Lee, Gim Hee·2023·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Incremental few-shot object detection aims at detecting novel classes without forgetting knowledge of the base classes with only a few labeled training data from the novel classes. Most related prior works are on incremental object detection that rely on the availability of abundant training samples per novel class that substantially limits the scalability to real-world setting where novel data can be scarce. In this paper, we propose the Incremental-DETR that does incremental few-shot object detection via fine-tuning and self-supervised learning on the DETR object detector. To alleviate severe over-fitting with few novel class data, we first fine-tune the class-specific components of DETR with self-supervision from additional object proposals generated using Selective Search as pseudo labels. We further introduce an incremental few-shot fine-tuning strategy with knowledge distillation on the class-specific components of DETR to encourage the network in detecting novel classes without forgetting the base classes. Extensive experiments conducted on standard incremental object detection and incremental few-shot object detection settings show that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin. Our source code is available at https://github.com/dongnana777/Incremental-DETR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v37i1.25129

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Everingham, M.; Van Gool, L.; Williams, C. K.; Winn, J.; and Zisserman, A. 2010. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. International journal of computer vision, 88(2): 303-338.
  2. Ganea, D. A.; Boom, B.; and Poppe, R. 2021. Incremen- tal Few-Shot Instance Segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1185-1194.
  3. Girshick, R. 2015. Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 1440-1448.
  4. Girshick, R.; Donahue, J.; Darrell, T.; and Malik, J. 2014a. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and se- mantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 580-587.
  5. Girshick, R.; Donahue, J.; Darrell, T.; and Malik, J. 2014b. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and se- mantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 580-587.
  6. Hinton, G.; Vinyals, O.; Dean, J.; et al. 2015. Distill- ing the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2(7). · arXiv
  7. Kj, J.; Rajasegaran, J.; Khan, S.; Khan, F. S.; and Balasub- ramanian, V. N. 2021. Incremental Object Detection via Meta-Learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
  8. Kuhn, H. W. 1955. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval research logistics quarterly, 2(1-2): 83-97.
  9. Lin, T.-Y.; Goyal, P.; Girshick, R.; He, K.; and Dollár, P. 2017b. Focal loss for dense object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2980-2988.
  10. Lin, T.-Y.; Maire, M.; Belongie, S.; Hays, J.; Perona, P.; Ramanan, D.; Dollár, P.; and Zitnick, C. L. 2014. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European conference on computer vision, 740-755. Springer.
  11. Liu, W.; Anguelov, D.; Erhan, D.; Szegedy, C.; Reed, S.; Fu, C. Y.; and Berg, A. C. 2016. SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. In European Conference on Computer Vision.
  12. Perez-Rua, J.-M.; Zhu, X.; Hospedales, T. M.; and Xiang, T. 2020. Incremental Few-Shot Object Detection. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 13846-13855.
  13. Ratcliff, R. 1990. Connectionist models of recognition mem- ory: constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological review, 97(2): 285.
  14. Rezatofighi, H.; Tsoi, N.; Gwak, J.; Sadeghian, A.; Reid, I.; and Savarese, S. 2019. Generalized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 658-666.
  15. Sun, B.; Li, B.; Cai, S.; Yuan, Y.; and Zhang, C. 2021. FSCE: Few-shot object detection via contrastive proposal encoding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 7352-7362.
  16. Uijlings, J. R.; Van De Sande, K. E.; Gevers, T.; and Smeul- ders, A. W. 2013. Selective search for object recognition. International journal of computer vision, 104(2): 154-171.
  17. Wang, X.; Huang, T. E.; Darrell, T.; Gonzalez, J. E.; and Yu, F. 2020. Frustratingly simple few-shot object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.06957. · arXiv
  18. Wang, Y.-X.; Ramanan, D.; and Hebert, M. 2019. Meta- learning to detect rare objects. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 9925-9934.
  19. Wu, J.; Liu, S.; Huang, D.; and Wang, Y. 2020. Multi- scale positive sample refinement for few-shot object detec- tion. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 456-472.
  20. Wu, X.; Sahoo, D.; and Hoi, S. 2020. Meta-RCNN: Meta learning for few-shot object detection. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 1679- 1687.
  21. Zhang, G.; Luo, Z.; Cui, K.; and Lu, S. 2021. Meta-detr: Few- shot object detection via unified image-level meta-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.11731, 2. · arXiv
  22. Zhou, X.; Wang, D.; and Krähenbühl, P. 2019. Objects as points. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.07850. · arXiv
  23. Zhu, X.; Su, W.; Lu, L.; Li, B.; Wang, X.; and Dai, J. 2020. Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04159. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 62

Metadata

Authors
Dong, N., Zhang, Y., Ding, M., & Lee, G. H.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2023-06-26
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
543-551
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W4382462248
Cited by
62
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10
FWCI
11.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation (AISG2-RP-2020-016)
  • National Research Foundation Singapore (AISG2-RP-2020-016), AISG Award No: AISG2-RP-2020-016)
  • Ministry of Education, India
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
self-supervised learning, DETR, knowledge distillation, selective search, pseudo-labeling, catastrophic forgetting, novel class detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review