Cited by 12Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Topic ModelingMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Journey to the Center of the Knowledge Neurons: Discoveries of Language-Independent Knowledge Neurons and Degenerate Knowledge Neurons

Open access
Chen, Yuheng, Cao, Pengfei, Chen, Yubo, Liu, Kang, Zhao, Jun·2024·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Pre-trained language models (PLMs) contain vast amounts of factual knowledge, but how the knowledge is stored in the parameters remains unclear. This paper delves into the complex task of understanding how factual knowledge is stored in multilingual PLMs, and introduces the Architecture-adapted Multilingual Integrated Gradients method, which successfully localizes knowledge neurons more precisely compared to current methods, and is more universal across various architectures and languages. Moreover, we conduct an in-depth exploration on knowledge neurons, leading to the following two important discoveries: (1) The discovery of Language-Independent Knowledge Neurons, which store factual knowledge in a form that transcends language. We design cross-lingual knowledge editing experiments, demonstrating that the PLMs can accomplish this task based on language-independent neurons; (2) The discovery of Degenerate Knowledge Neurons, a novel type of neuron showing that different knowledge neurons can store the same fact. Its property of functional overlap endows the PLMs with a robust mastery of factual knowledge. We design fact-checking experiments, proving that the degenerate knowledge neurons can help the PLMs to detect wrong facts. Experiments corroborate these findings, shedding light on the mechanisms of factual knowledge storage in multilingual PLMs, and contribute valuable insights to the field. The code is available at https://github.com/heng840/AMIG.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29735

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The parameters of modern LLMs encode a remarkable amount of world knowledge.

    “It is well-accepted, even among skeptical researchers, that the parameters of modern LLMs encode a remarkable amount of world knowledge [2, 12, 23, 28, 31, 39, 62, 79], which can be leveraged by an LLM in flexible and robust ways [81, 83, 93].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 12

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Devlin, J.; Chang, M.; Lee, K.; and Toutanova, K. 2018. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. CoRR, abs/1810.04805. · arXiv
  2. Enguehard, J. 2023. Sequential Integrated Gradients: a sim- ple but effective method for explaining language models. arXiv:2305.15853. · arXiv
  3. Geva, M.; Schuster, R.; Berant, J.; and Levy, O. 2021. Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memo- ries. arXiv:2012.14913. · arXiv
  4. Hase, P.; Bansal, M.; Kim, B.; and Ghandeharioun, A. 2023. Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language Models. arXiv:2301.04213. · arXiv
  5. Kandpal, N.; Deng, H.; Roberts, A.; Wallace, E.; and Raffel, C. 2023. Large language models struggle to learn long- tail knowledge. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 15696-15707.
  6. PMLR.
  7. Kassner, N.; Dufter, P.; and Schütze, H. 2021. Multilingual LAMA: Investigating Knowledge in Multilingual Pretrained Language Models. arXiv:2102.00894. · arXiv
  8. Li, S.; Li, X.; Shang, L.; Dong, Z.; Sun, C.; Liu, B.; Ji, Z.; Jiang, X.; and Liu, Q. 2022. How Pre-trained Language Mod- els Capture Factual Knowledge? A Causal-Inspired Analysis. arXiv:2203.16747. · arXiv
  9. Lundstrom, D. D.; Huang, T.; and Razaviyayn, M. 2022. A rigorous study of integrated gradients method and extensions to internal neuron attributions. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 14485-14508.
  10. PMLR.
  11. Mason, P. H. 2015. Degeneracy: Demystifying and destigma- tizing a core concept in systems biology. Complexity, 20(3): 12-21.
  12. Meng, K.; Sen Sharma, A.; Andonian, A.; Belinkov, Y.; and Bau, D. 2022b. Mass Editing Memory in a Transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07229. · arXiv
  13. Mitchell, E.; Lin, C.; Bosselut, A.; Finn, C.; and Manning, C. D. 2022. Fast Model Editing at Scale. In International Conference on Learning Representations. OpenAI. 2023. GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv:2303.08774. · arXiv
  14. Petroni, F.; Rocktäschel, T.; Riedel, S.; Lewis, P.; Bakhtin, A.; Wu, Y.; and Miller, A. 2019a. Language Models as Knowl- edge Bases? In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Pro- cessing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), 2463-2473. Hong Kong, China: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  15. Petroni, F.; Rocktäschel, T.; Lewis, P.; Bakhtin, A.; Wu, Y.; Miller, A. H.; and Riedel, S. 2019b. Language Models as Knowledge Bases? arXiv:1909.01066. · arXiv
  16. Sanyal, S.; and Ren, X. 2021. Discretized Integrated Gradi- ents for Explaining Language Models. arXiv:2108.13654. · arXiv
  17. Sundararajan, M.; Taly, A.; and Yan, Q. 2017. Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks. arXiv:1703.01365. · arXiv
  18. Tononi, G.; Sporns, O.; and Edelman, G. M. 1999. Mea- sures of degeneracy and redundancy in biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(6): 3257-3262.
  19. Touvron, H.; Martin, L.; Stone, K.; Albert, P.; Almahairi, A.; Babaei, Y.; Bashlykov, N.; Batra, S.; Bhargava, P.; Bhosale, S.; Bikel, D.; Blecher, L.; Ferrer, C. C.; Chen, M.; Cucurull, G.; Esiobu, D.; Fernandes, J.; Fu, J.; Fu, W.; Fuller, B.; Gao, C.; Goswami, V.; Goyal, N.; Hartshorn, A.; Hosseini, S.; Hou, R.; Inan, H.; Kardas, M.; Kerkez, V.; Khabsa, M.; Kloumann, I.; Korenev, A.; Koura, P. S.; Lachaux, M.-A.; Lavril, T.; Lee, J.; Liskovich, D.; Lu, Y.; Mao, Y.; Martinet, X.; Mihaylov, T.; Mishra, P.; Molybog, I.; Nie, Y.; Poulton, A.; Reizenstein, J.; Rungta, R.; Saladi, K.; Schelten, A.; Silva, R.; Smith, E. M.; Subramanian, R.; Tan, X. E.; Tang, B.; Taylor, R.; Williams, A.; Kuan, J. X.; Xu, P.; Yan, Z.; Zarov, I.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, A.; Kambadur, M.; Narang, S.; Rodriguez, A.; Stojnic, R.; Edunov, S.; and Scialom, T. 2023. Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models. arXiv:2307.09288. · arXiv
  20. Vladika, J.; and Matthes, F. 2023. Scientific Fact-Checking: A Survey of Resources and Approaches. arXiv:2305.16859. · arXiv
  21. Wang, Z.; Lipton, Z. C.; and Tsvetkov, Y. 2020. On Negative Interference in Multilingual Models: Findings and A Meta- Learning Treatment. In Proceedings of the 2020 Confer- ence on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 4438-4450. Online: Association for Computa- tional Linguistics.
  22. Xu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Che, W.; and Zhang, M. 2023. Language Anisotropic Cross-Lingual Model Editing. arXiv:2205.12677. · arXiv
  23. Zhen, C.; Shang, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; and Zhang, D. 2022. A survey on knowledge-enhanced pre-trained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.13428. · arXiv
  24. Zhou, C.; Li, Q.; Li, C.; Yu, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, G.; Zhang, K.; Ji, C.; Yan, Q.; He, L.; et al. 2023. A comprehensive survey on pretrained foundation models: A history from bert to chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09419. · arXiv

Authors
Chen, Y., Cao, P., Chen, Y., Liu, K., & Zhao, J.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-03-24
Volume
38
Issue
16
Pages
17817-17825
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W4393147147
Cited by
12
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61976211, 62176257, 202202AD080004)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA27020100)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020AAA0106400)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
pre-trained language models, multilingual language models, integrated gradients, knowledge localization, fact-checking, knowledge representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review