The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Space Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Open accessAbstract
We are pleased to introduce the space application issue articles in this issue of AI Magazine. The exploration of space is a testament to human curiosity and the desire to understand the universe that we inhabit. As many space agencies around the world design and deploy missions, it is apparent that there is a need for intelligent, exploring systems that can make decisions on their own in remote, potentially hostile environments. At the same time, the monetary cost of operating missions, combined with the growing complexity of the instruments and vehicles being deployed, make it apparent that substantial improvements can be made by the judicious use of automation in mission operations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The autonomous capabilities of NASA's Opportunity rover came from MAPGEN, a mixed-initiative task planner and an autonomous navigation system.
“For example, the autonomous capabilities of NASA's Opportunity rover came from MAPGEN, a mixedinitiative task planner and an autonomous navigation system.”
From Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions (2024) · cites this paper as [224]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1109/MIS.2004.1265878 · DOI
- Bresina J. L., 2005, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 40
- Bernard D., 2000, Remote Agent Experiment: Final Report
- 10.1023/A:1007400206189 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00138-007-0081-3 · DOI
- 10.1145/1150402.1150519 · DOI
- Cheeseman C., 1996, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
- 10.2514/1.12923 · DOI
- 10.1109/MIS.2005.40 · DOI
- Chien S. Johnston M. Policella N. Frank J. Lenzen C. Giuliano M. Kavelaars A.2012a.A Generalized Timeline Representation Services and Interface for Automating Space Mission Operations. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Space Operations (SpaceOps 2012) Stockholm Sweden 11–15 June. · DOI
- Chien S. McLaren D. Doubleday J. Tran D. Tanpipat V. Chitadron R. Boonyaaroonnet S. Thanapakpawin B.; andMandl D.2012b.Automated Space‐Based Monitoring of Flooding in Thailand. Paper presented at the 11th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence Robotics and Automation for Space (i‐SAIRAS 2012) Turin Italy September.
- Deale M., 1994, Intelligent Scheduling, 423
- 10.1145/2168752.216876 · DOI
- 10.1145/240455.240471 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-1-55860-307-3.50021-6 · DOI
- 10.2514/6.1993-4630 · DOI
- Johnston M. D., 1994, Intelligent Scheduling, 391
- 10.1609/aimag.v28i4.2066 · DOI
- Kruse F. A. Boardman J. W.; andHuntginton J. F.2003.Final Report: Evaluation and Geologic Validation of EO‐1 Hyperion. Technical Report Analytical Imaging and Geophysics LLC Boulder CO. · DOI
- Mandrake L., 2012, Surface Sulfur Detection via Remote Sensing and Onboard Classification, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 3, 77
- 10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rse.2006.08.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00068-X · DOI
- Rabideau G. Chien S. Sherwood R. Tran D. Cichy B. Mandl D. Frye S. Shulman S. Bote R. Szwaczkowski J. Boyer D.; andVan Gaasbeck J.2004.Mission Operations with Autonomy: A Preliminary Report for Earth Observing‐1. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Planning and Scheduling for Space (IWPSS 2004) Darmstadt Germany 23–25 June.
- 10.1109/MIS.2013.10 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2226040 · DOI
- Tran D. Chien S. Rabideau G. Cichy B.2004.Flight Software Issues in Onboard Automated Planning: Lessons Learned on EO‐1. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Planning and Scheduling for Space (IWPSS 2004) Darmstadt Germany 23–25 June.
- 10.1145/2168752.2168763 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions
Oche, P. A., Ewa, G. A., & Ibekwe, N. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3132500 · Cited by 68
“Orbital Launch Attempts by Countries in 2017 [222] we can increase the levels of autonomy and automation, thereby freeing humans to focus on tasks for which they are better suited [223].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Chien, S., & Morris, R.
- Affiliations
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- Venue
- AI Magazine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3-6
- ISSN
- 0738-4602 (ISSN-L)
- 2371-9621
- OpenAlex
- W1569410076
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- AI Magazine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Space exploration and regulation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in space, space exploration, autonomous decision-making, remote environments, space mission operations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
