The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination
Abstract
The emergence of expert systems as one of the major ar-eas of activity within AI has resulted in a rapid growth of interest within the AI community in issues relating to the management of uncertainty and evidential reasoning. Dur-ing the past two years, in particular, the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence has att,ract,ed considerable attention as a promising method of dealing with some of the basic prob-lems arising in combination of evidence and data fusion. To develop an adequate understanding of this theory re-quires considerable effort and a good background in proba-bility theory. There is, however, a simple way of approach-ing the Dempster-Shafer theory that only requires a min-imal familiarity with relational models of data. For some-one with a background in AI or database management, this approach has the advantage of relating in a natural way to the familiar framework of AI and databases. Fur-thermore, it clarifies some of the controversial issues in the Dempster-Shafer theory and points to ways in which it can be extended and made useful in AI-oriented app1ications.l The Basic Idea The basic idea underlying the approach in question is that in the context of relational databases the Dempster-Shafer theory can be viewed as an instance of inference from second-order relations, that is; relations in which the en-tries are first-order relations. ’ To clarify this point, let
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1988) · Cited by 16,582
Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination
Yang, J.-B., & Xu, D.-L. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2013.09.003 · Cited by 719
Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence
Yong, D., WenKang, S., ZhenFu, Z., & Qi, L. (2004) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2004.04.015 · Cited by 579
Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis in Engineering and the Sciences
Ayyub, B. M., & Klir, G. J. (2006) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420011456 · Cited by 371
A survey: Optimization and applications of evidence fusion algorithm based on Dempster–Shafer theory
Zhao, K., Li, L., Chen, Z., Sun, R., Yuan, G., & Li, J. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109075 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Zadeh, L. A.
- Published
- 1986-07-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-90
- OpenAlex
- W2096088275
- Cited by
- 793
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1609/aimag.v7i2.542
- The paper
- Zadeh, L. A. (1986). A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v7i2.542
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.