Cited by 209Complex Network Analysis TechniquesMisinformation and Its ImpactsWeb Data Mining and Analysis

How does the data sampling strategy impact the discovery of information diffusion in social media?

Open access
De Choudhury, Munmun, Lin, Yu-Ru, Sundaram, Hari, Candan, Kasim Selcuk, Xie, Lexing, Kelliher, Aisling·2010·Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Abstract

Platforms such as Twitter have provided researchers with ample opportunities to analytically study social phenomena. There are however, significant computational challenges due to the enormous rate of production of new information: researchers are therefore, often forced to analyze a judiciously selected “sample” of the data. Like other social media phenomena, information diffusion is a social process–it is affected by user context, and topic, in addition to the graph topology. This paper studies the impact of different attribute and topology based sampling strategies on the discovery of an important social media phenomena–information diffusion.We examine several widely-adopted sampling methods that select nodes based on attribute (random, location, and activity) and topology (forest fire) as well as study the impact of attribute based seed selection on topology based sampling. Then we develop a series of metrics for evaluating the quality of the sample, based on user activity (e.g. volume, number of seeds), topological (e.g. reach, spread) and temporal characteristics (e.g. rate). We additionally correlate the diffusion volume metric with two external variables–search and news trends. Our experiments reveal that for small sample sizes (30%), a sample that incorporates both topology and user context (e.g. location, activity) can improve on naive methods by a significant margin of ~15-20%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In social datasets, linking biases can be exacerbated by how data is collected and sampled, and by how links are defined, impacting observed properties of network-based user attributes such as centrality.

    “In social datasets, linking biases can be further exacerbated by how data is collected and sampled, and by how links are defined, impacting the observed properties of a variety of network-based user attributes, such as their centrality within a social network”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Choudhury et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Choudhury, M., Lin, Y.-R., Sundaram, H., Candan, K. S., Xie, L., & Kelliher, A.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Published
2010-05-16
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
34-41
ISSN
  • 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-0770
OpenAlex
W49973572
Cited by
209
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
Keywords
information dissemination, social media, Twitter, sampling strategy, node sampling, user activity, user location, search trends, news trends, graph topology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review