The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling Bursty Temporal Pattern of Rumors
Open accessAbstract
Online social networks enable fast and wide diffusion of rumors, which could be potential threats to the society. Understanding the rumor spreading mechanism is therefore essential. This demo presents an agent-pattern based model that can explain the spiky temporal diffusion pattern of rumors. The demo platform provides an interface allowing users to check a wide set of parameters contribute to the characteristic temporal pattern of rumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rumour popularity tends to fluctuate over time on social media and other internet platforms, but may be discussed again after popularity fades.
“Other studies looking at temporal patterns of rumours have suggested that their popularity tends to fluctuate over time in social media (Kwon et al. 2013;Kwon and Cha 2014;Lukasik et al. 2015b) and other platforms on the internet (Jo 2002), but with a possibility of being discussed again later in time after rumour popularity fades.”
From Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media: A Survey (2019) · cites this paper as Kwon and Cha 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kwon, S.; Cha, M.; Jung, K.; Chen, W.; and Wang, Y. 2013. Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media. In proc. of IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media: A Survey
Zubiaga, A., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K., Liakata, M., & Procter, R. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3161603 · Cited by 862
“…looking at temporal patterns of rumours have suggested that their popularity tends to fluctuate over time in social media [Kwon et al. 2013; Kwon and Cha 2014; Lukasik et al. 2015b] and other platforms on the Internet [Jo 2002], but with a possibility of being discussed again later in time after…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwon, S., & Cha, M.
- Affiliations
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- ORCID
- Cha, Meeyoung
- Venue
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
- Published
- 2014-05-16
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 650-651
- ISSN
- 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-0770
- OpenAlex
- W2263969377
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 12.46
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- rumor propagation, social networking sites, agent-based modeling, parameter sensitivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
