Cited by 75Complex Network Analysis TechniquesMedia and Digital CommunicationDigital Marketing and Social Media

Of Pins and Tweets: Investigating How Users Behave Across Image- and Text-Based Social Networks

Open access
Ottoni, Raphael, Las Casas, Diego, Pesce, João Paulo, Meira Jr., Wagner, Wilson, Christo, Mislove, Alan, Almeida, Virgilio·2014·Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Abstract

Today, it is the norm for online social (OSN) users to have accounts on multiple services. For example, a recent study showed that 34% of all Twitter users also use Pinterest. This situation leads to interesting questions such as: Are the activities that users perform on each site disjoint? Alternatively, if users perform the same actions on multiple sites, where does the information originate? Given the interlinking between social networks, failure to understand activity across multiple sites may obfuscate the true information dissemination dynamics of the social web. In this study, we take the first steps towards a more complete understanding of user behavior across multiple OSNs. We collect a sample of over 30,000 users that have accounts on both Twitter and Pinterest, crawling their profile information and activity on a daily basis for a period of almost three months. We develop a novel methodology for comparing activity across these two sites. We find that the global patterns of use across the two sites differ significantly, and that users tend to post items to Pinterest before posting them on Twitter. Our findings can inform the understanding of the behavior of users on individual sites, as well as the dynamics of sharing across the social web.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14514

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies looking at similarities and differences among social platforms found differences with respect to user personalities, news spreading, or content sharing.

    “For instance, studies looking at similarities and differences among social platforms found differences with respect to user personalities (Hughes et al., 2012), news spreading (Lerman and Ghosh, 2010), or content sharing (Ottoni et al., 2014).”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Ottoni et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ottoni, R., Las Casas, D., Pesce, J. P., Meira Jr., W., Wilson, C., Mislove, A., & Almeida, V.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Published
2014-05-16
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
386-395
ISSN
  • 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-0770
OpenAlex
W2183238970
Cited by
75
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1054233, 1319019)
  • Amazon Web Services
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-12-1-0556, W911NF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
Twitter, Pinterest, information dissemination, user activity patterns, Web 2.0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review