Cited by 26Web Data Mining and AnalysisInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorComputational and Text Analysis Methods

Adaptive method for following dynamic topics on twitter

Open access
Magdy, Walid, Elsayed, Tamer·2014·Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Abstract

Many research social studies of public response on social media require following (i.e., tracking) topics on Twitter for long periods of time. The current approaches rely on streaming tweets based on some hashtags or keywords, or following some Twitter accounts. Such approaches lead to limited coverage of on-topic tweets. In this paper, we introduce a novel technique for following such topics in a more effective way. A topic is defined as a set of well-prepared queries that cover the static side of the topic. We propose an automatic approach that adapts to emerging aspects of a tracked broad topic over time. We tested our tracking approach on three broad dynamic topics that are hot in different categories: Egyptian politics, Syrian conflict, and international sports. We measured the effectiveness of our approach over four full days spanning a period of four months to ensure consistency in effectiveness. Experimental results showed that, on average, our approach achieved over 100% increase in recall relative to the baseline Boolean approach, while maintaining an acceptable precision of 83%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14540

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • Political Polarization on Twitter

    Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14126 · Cited by 626 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “…task are news monitoring (Magdy, 2013), crisis management (Vieweg et al., 2010), customer feedback detection (Chen at al., 2013), public political polarization analysis (Conover, 2011), election results prediction (Tumasjan et al., 2010), and public healthcare monitoring tools (Ali et al., 2013).”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magdy, W., & Elsayed, T.
Affiliations
  • Quantum Chemistry Research Institute (JP)
  • Qatar University (QA)
Venue
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Published
2014-05-16
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
335-345
ISSN
  • 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-0770
OpenAlex
W2263984121
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
topic tracking, Twitter, Egyptian politics, Syrian civil war, sport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review