Cited by 215Geographic Information Systems StudiesHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisSmart Cities and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Tale of Cities: Urban Biases in Volunteered Geographic Information

Open access
Hecht, Brent, Stephens, Monica·2014·Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Abstract

Geotagged tweets, Foursquare check-ins and other forms of volunteered geographic information (VGI) play a critical role in numerous studies and a large range of intelligent technologies. We show that three of the most commonly used sources of VGI – Twitter, Flickr, and Foursquare – are biased towards urban perspectives at the expense of rural ones. Utilizing a geostatistics-based approach, we demonstrate that, on a per capita basis, these important VGI datasets have more users, more information, and higher quality information within metropolitan areas than outside of them. VGI is a subset of user-generated content (UGC) and we discuss how our results suggest that urban biases might exist in non-geographically referenced UGC as well. Finally, because Foursquare is exclusively made up of VGI, we argue that Foursquare (and possibly other location-based social networks) has fundamentally failed to appeal to rural populations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14554

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data-driven public policies may only succeed in economically advantaged, urban, and data-rich areas if efforts are not made to improve data collection elsewhere.

    “data-driven public policies may only succeed in economically advantaged, urban, and data-rich areas (Hecht and Stephens, 2014; Shelton et al., 2014), if efforts are not made to improve data collection elsewhere”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Hecht and Stephens, 2014

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hecht, B., & Stephens, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Published
2014-05-16
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
197-205
ISSN
  • 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-0770
OpenAlex
W285374334
Cited by
215
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6
FWCI
87.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
volunteered geographic information, urban bias, rural-urban disparity, geo-tagged tweets, Foursquare check-ins, Flickr, user-generated content, location-based social networks, data quality, metropolitan areas, geostatistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review