Finding approximate POMDP solutions through belief compression
Open accessAbstract
Standard value function approaches to finding policies for Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) are generally considered to be intractable for large models. The intractability of these algorithms is to a large extent a consequence of computing an exact, optimal policy over the entire belief space. However, in real-world POMDP problems, computing the optimal policy for the full belief space is often unnecessary for good control even for problems with complicated policy classes. The beliefs experienced by the controller often lie near a structured, low-dimensional subspace embedded in the high-dimensional belief space. Finding a good approximation to the optimal value function for only this subspace can be much easier than computing the full value function. We introduce a new method for solving large-scale POMDPs by reducing the dimensionality of the belief space. We use Exponential family Principal Components Analysis (Collins, Dasgupta & Schapire, 2002) to represent sparse, high-dimensional belief spaces using small sets of learned features of the belief state. We then plan only in terms of the low-dimensional belief features. By planning in this low-dimensional space, we can find policies for POMDP models that are orders of magnitude larger than models that can be handled by conventional techniques. We demonstrate the use of this algorithm on a synthetic problem and on mobile robot navigation tasks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There may be other representations that are sufficient for the particular task of estimating future reward, but easier to compute than the full belief state.
“This suggests that there may be other representations that are sufficient for the particular task of estimating future reward, but easier to compute than the full belief state [18,19].”
From Emergence of belief-like representations through reinforcement learning (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 142 · Cited by 254
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Galassi, M., Davies, J., Theiler, J., Gough, B., Jungman, G., Booth, M., & Rossi, F. (2002). GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual (3rd Edition edition). http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/.
- Morgan Kaufmann.
- Mardia, K. V., & Jupp, P. E. (2000). Directional Statistics (2nd edition). Wiley, Chichester, NY.
- Morgan Kaufmann.
- Morgan Kaufmann.
- Rockafellar, R. T. (1970). Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
- Morgan Kaufmann.
- Authors
- Roy, N., Gordon, G., & Thrun, S.
- Affiliations
- MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
- Publisher
- AI Access Foundation
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 1-40
- ISSN
- 1076-9757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116753650
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 142
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0121426)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Air Force Research Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
- Keywords
- partially observable Markov decision processes, value function approximation, mobile robot navigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review