Cited by 254Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningRobotic Path Planning Algorithms

Finding approximate POMDP solutions through belief compression

Open access
Roy, N., Gordon, G., Thrun, S.·2005·Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

Abstract

Standard value function approaches to finding policies for Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) are generally considered to be intractable for large models. The intractability of these algorithms is to a large extent a consequence of computing an exact, optimal policy over the entire belief space. However, in real-world POMDP problems, computing the optimal policy for the full belief space is often unnecessary for good control even for problems with complicated policy classes. The beliefs experienced by the controller often lie near a structured, low-dimensional subspace embedded in the high-dimensional belief space. Finding a good approximation to the optimal value function for only this subspace can be much easier than computing the full value function. We introduce a new method for solving large-scale POMDPs by reducing the dimensionality of the belief space. We use Exponential family Principal Components Analysis (Collins, Dasgupta & Schapire, 2002) to represent sparse, high-dimensional belief spaces using small sets of learned features of the belief state. We then plan only in terms of the low-dimensional belief features. By planning in this low-dimensional space, we can find policies for POMDP models that are orders of magnitude larger than models that can be handled by conventional techniques. We demonstrate the use of this algorithm on a synthetic problem and on mobile robot navigation tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1613/jair.1496

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There may be other representations that are sufficient for the particular task of estimating future reward, but easier to compute than the full belief state.

    “This suggests that there may be other representations that are sufficient for the particular task of estimating future reward, but easier to compute than the full belief state [18,19].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 142 · Cited by 254

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Galassi, M., Davies, J., Theiler, J., Gough, B., Jungman, G., Booth, M., & Rossi, F. (2002). GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual (3rd Edition edition). http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/.
  2. Morgan Kaufmann.
  3. Mardia, K. V., & Jupp, P. E. (2000). Directional Statistics (2nd edition). Wiley, Chichester, NY.
  4. Morgan Kaufmann.
  5. Morgan Kaufmann.
  6. Rockafellar, R. T. (1970). Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
  7. Morgan Kaufmann.

Authors
Roy, N., Gordon, G., & Thrun, S.
Affiliations
  • MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Published
2005-01-01
Volume
23
Pages
1-40
ISSN
1076-9757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116753650
Cited by
254
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 16
FWCI
15.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0121426)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Air Force Research Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Keywords
partially observable Markov decision processes, value function approximation, mobile robot navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review