The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Concept Hierarchies from Text Corpora using Formal Concept Analysis
Open accessAbstract
We present a novel approach to the automatic acquisition of taxonomies or concept hierarchies from a text corpus. The approach is based on Formal Concept Analysis (FCA), a method mainly used for the analysis of data, i.e. for investigating and processing explicitly given information. We follow Harris' distributional hypothesis and model the context of a certain term as a vector representing syntactic dependencies which are automatically acquired from the text corpus with a linguistic parser. On the basis of this context information, FCA produces a lattice that we convert into a special kind of partial order constituting a concept hierarchy. The approach is evaluated by comparing the resulting concept hierarchies with hand-crafted taxonomies for two domains: tourism and finance. We also directly compare our approach with hierarchical agglomerative clustering as well as with Bi-Section-KMeans as an instance of a divisive clustering algorithm. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of using different measures weighting the contribution of each attribute as well as of applying a particular smoothing technique to cope with data sparseness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2012) · Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5195 · Cited by 19,370
WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database
Kilgarriff, A., & Fellbaum, C. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,464
Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations
Ganter, B., Wille, R., & Franzke, C. (1998) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 4,245
Abe, S. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0285-4 · Cited by 3,721
Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora
Hearst, M. A. (1992) · Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics - · doi:10.3115/992133.992154 · Cited by 3,253
A Comparison of Document Clustering Techniques
Steinbach, M. S., Karypis, G., & Kumar, V. (2000) · Cited by 2,532
Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (2001) · Cited by 2,463
English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation
Tenny, C., & Levin, B. (1995) · Language · doi:10.2307/415968 · Cited by 2,299
SLINK: An optimally efficient algorithm for the single-link cluster method
Sibson, R. (1973) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/16.1.30 · Cited by 1,203
Distributional clustering of English words
Pereira, F., Tishby, N., & Lee, L. (1993) · Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - · doi:10.3115/981574.981598 · Cited by 974
Cited by
Measuring the complexity of the law: the United States Code
Katz, D. M., & Bommarito, M. J. (2014) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-014-9160-8 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Cimiano, P., Hotho, A., & Staab, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
- Publisher
- AI Access Foundation
- Published
- 2005-08-01
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 305-339
- ISSN
- 1076-9757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123982464
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 32.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Concept Hierarchies from Text Corpora using Formal Concept Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1613/jair.1648
- The paper
- Cimiano, P., Hotho, A., & Staab, S. (2005). Learning Concept Hierarchies from Text Corpora using Formal Concept Analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.