The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infinite-Horizon Policy-Gradient Estimation
Open accessAbstract
Gradient-based approaches to direct policy search in reinforcement learning have received much recent attention as a means to solve problems of partial observability and to avoid some of the problems associated with policy degradation in value-function methods. In this paper we introduce GPOMDP, a simulation-based algorithm for generating a biased estimate of the gradient of the average reward in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes POMDPs controlled by parameterized stochastic policies. A similar algorithm was proposed by (Kimura et al. 1995). The algorithm's chief advantages are that it requires storage of only twice the number of policy parameters, uses one free beta (which has a natural interpretation in terms of bias-variance trade-off), and requires no knowledge of the underlying state. We prove convergence of GPOMDP, and show how the correct choice of the parameter beta is related to the mixing time of the controlled POMDP. We briefly describe extensions of GPOMDP to controlled Markov chains, continuous state, observation and control spaces, multiple-agents, higher-order derivatives, and a version for training stochastic policies with internal states. In a companion paper (Baxter et al., this volume) we show how the gradient estimates generated by GPOMDP can be used in both a traditional stochastic gradient algorithm and a conjugate-gradient procedure to find local optima of the average reward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
A Survey of Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning: Standard and Natural Policy Gradients
Grondman, I., Busoniu, L., Lopes, G. A. D., & Babuska, R. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2012.2218595 · Cited by 1,042
Reinforcement learning of motor skills with policy gradients
Peters, J., & Schaal, S. (2008) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2008.02.003 · Cited by 831
A Survey on Machine-Learning Techniques in Cognitive Radios
Bkassiny, M., Li, Y., & Jayaweera, S. K. (2013) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2012.100412.00017 · Cited by 580
Application of deep reinforcement learning to intrusion detection for supervised problems
Lopez-Martin, M., Carro, B., & Sanchez-Esguevillas, A. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112963 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Baxter, J., & Bartlett, P. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
- Publisher
- AI Access Foundation
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- 319-350
- ISSN
- 1076-9757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144446635
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infinite-Horizon Policy-Gradient Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1613/jair.806
- The paper
- Baxter, J., & Bartlett, P. L. (2001). Infinite-Horizon Policy-Gradient Estimation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.