Cited by 217Weed Control and Herbicide ApplicationsAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactionsAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

Timing of Cover-Crop Management Effects on Weed Suppression in No-Till Planted Soybean using a Roller-Crimper

Mirsky, S. B., Curran, W. S., Mortenseny, D. M., Ryany, M. R., Shumway, D. L.·2011·Weed Science

Abstract

Integrated weed management tactics are necessary to develop cropping systems that enhance soil quality using conservation tillage and reduced herbicide or organic weed management. In this study, we varied planting and termination date of two cereal rye cultivars (‘Aroostook’ and ‘Wheeler’) and a rye/hairy vetch mixture to evaluate cover-crop biomass production and subsequent weed suppression in no-till planted soybean. Cover crops were killed with a burn-down herbicide and roller-crimper and the weed-suppressive effects of the remaining mulch were studied. Cover-crop biomass increased approximately 2,000 kg ha −1 from latest to earliest fall planting dates (August 25–October 15) and for each 10-d incremental delay in spring termination date (May 1–June 1). Biomass accumulation for cereal rye was best estimated using a thermal-based model that separated the effects of fall and spring heat units. Cultivars differed in their total biomass accumulation; however, once established, their growth rates were similar, suggesting the difference was mainly due to the earlier emergence of Aroostook rye. The earlier emergence of Aroostook rye may have explained its greater weed suppression than Wheeler, whereas the rye/hairy vetch mixture was intermediate between the two rye cultivars. Delaying cover-crop termination reduced weed density, especially for early- and late-emerging summer annual weeds in 2006. Yellow nutsedge was not influenced by cover-crop type or the timing of cover-crop management. We found that the degree of synchrony between weed species emergence and accumulated cover-crop biomass played an important role in defining the extent of weed suppression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1614/ws-d-10-00101.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mirsky, S. B., Curran, W. S., Mortenseny, D. M., Ryany, M. R., & Shumway, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Weed Science
Published
2011-09
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
380-389
ISSN
  • 0043-1745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2759
OpenAlex
W2165394917
Cited by
217
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Weed Science (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Keywords
cover crops, weed suppression, no-till soybean, roller-crimper, cereal rye, hairy vetch, sowing date, cover crop biomass, Cyperus esculentus, conservation tillage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review