Cited by 153Weed Control and Herbicide ApplicationsSoil Management and Crop YieldAllelopathy and phytotoxic interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

European Perspectives on the Adoption of Nonchemical Weed Management in Reduced-Tillage Systems for Arable Crops

Open access

Abstract

Noninversion tillage with tine- or disc-based cultivations prior to crop establishment is the most common way of reducing tillage for arable cropping systems with small grain cereals, oilseed rape, and maize in Europe. However, new regulations on pesticide use might hinder further expansion of reduced-tillage systems. European agriculture is asked to become less dependent on pesticides and promote crop protection programs based on integrated pest management (IPM) principles. Conventional noninversion tillage systems rely entirely on the availability of glyphosate products, and herbicide consumption is mostly higher compared to plow-based cropping systems. Annual grass weeds and catchweed bedstraw often constitute the principal weed problems in noninversion tillage systems, and crop rotations concurrently have very high proportions of winter cereals. There is a need to redesign cropping systems to allow for more diversification of the crop rotations to combat these weed problems with less herbicide input. Cover crops, stubble management strategies, and tactics that strengthen crop growth relative to weed growth are also seen as important components in future IPM systems, but their impact in noninversion tillage systems needs validation. Direct mechanical weed control methods based on rotating weeding devices such as rotary hoes could become useful in reduced-tillage systems where more crop residues and less workable soils are more prevalent, but further development is needed for effective application. Owing to the frequent use of glyphosate in reduced-tillage systems, perennial weeds are not particularly problematic. However, results from organic cropping systems clearly reveal that desisting from glyphosate use inevitably leads to more problems with perennials, which need to be addressed in future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1614/wt-d-12-00066.1

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Zwerger, 1990, Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society Symposium, Helsinki, Finland, 127
  2. Vullioud, 2004, Résultats de 34 ans de culture sans labour à Changins. I. Evolution des rendements, Rev. Suisse Agric, 36, 202
  3. Melander, 1994, Workshop I of EU Concerted Action 27–28 June: Experiences with the Applicability of No-Tillage Crop Production in the West-European Countries, 49
  4. Chauvel, 2011, Gestion intégrée de la flore adventice dans les systèmes de culture sans labour. Cah, Agric, 20, 194
  5. Pedersen, 2011, Radrensning af majs og raps. Farmtest Maskiner og Planteavl 118, 33
  6. Melander, 1998, Final Report of EU Concerted Action: Experiences with the Applicability of No-Tillage Crop Production in the West-European Countries, 63
  7. Melander, 2010b, Intern Rapport, Markbrug nr. 29, September 2010. Aarhus Universitet, 27
  8. Dugon, 2010, Pratiques phytosanitaires dans un réseau d'exploitations de grandes cultures de 1992 à 2004. Rech, Agronomique Suisse, 1, 416
  9. Mamarot, 2005, Gérer les mauvaises en non-labour. Des références obtenues en Midi-Pyrénées, Phytoma, La Défense des Végétaux, 582, 60
  10. Orson, 2006, Tillage Systems for the Benefit of Agriculture and the Environment, 46
  11. Rasmussen, 1984, Methods of tillage for spring barley on coarse sandy soils. Dan, J. Plant Soil Sci, 88, 443
  12. Davies, 2002, Reduced cultivation for cereals: research, development and advisory needs under changing economic circumstances, Home Grown Cereals Authority, Research Review, 48, 57
  13. Pallutt, 2011, Pflügen oder Nichtpflügen—Konsequenzen für den Pflanzenschutz, LandInForm Spezial, 2, 45
  14. van der Weide, 2011, Proceedings of the 9th EWRS Workshop on Physical and Cultural Weed Control, 13
  15. Labreuche, 2008, Les techniques culturales sans labour concernent un tiers des surfaces françaises. Perspect, Agricoles, 342, 38
  16. Wilson B. J. and Wright K. J. 1991. Effects of cultivation and seed shedding on the population dynamics of Galium aparine in winter wheat crops. Pages 813–820 in Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Weeds. Vol. 2. Farnham, UK : British Crop Protection Council.
  17. Kristensen H. 1997. Erfaringer med mekanisk ukrudtsbekæmpelse i raps. Pages 179–182 in Proceedings of the 14th Danish Plant Protection Conference/Weeds. Nyborg, Denmark : Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.
  18. Johnson, 2007, Topics in Canadian Weed Science. Physical Weed Control: Progress and Challenges, 6, 45
  19. Vullioud, 2006, Résultats de 35 ans de culture sans labour à Changins III. Mauvaises herbes, maladies fongiques et ravageurs, Rev. Suisse Agric, 38, 81

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–152 of 152

Metadata

Authors
Melander, B., Munier-Jolain, N., Charles, R., Wirth, J., Schwarz, J., van der Weide, R., Bonin, L., Jensen, P. K., & Kudsk, P.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Université de Bourgogne (FR)
  • Agroscope (CH)
  • Julius Kühn-Institut (DE)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Arvalis - Institut du Végétal (FR)
Corresponding author
Melander, Bo
Venue
Weed Technology
Published
2013-03
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
231-240
ISSN
  • 0890-037X (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2740
OpenAlex
W2100136684
Cited by
153
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
FWCI
13.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Weed Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
Keywords
reduced tillage, integrated pest management, glyphosate, herbicide reduction, annual grass weeds, crop rotation diversification, cover crops, stubble management, mechanical weed control, rotary hoe, perennial weeds, organic production systems, pesticide regulation, small grains, oilseed rape, maize

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review