Thermal Conduction in Silicon Micro- and Nanostructures
Abstract
Silicon micro- and nanostructures are found in integrated circuits, sensors, and actuators, and the performance and reliability of many of these devices are affected by thermal conduction. Conduction processes in micro- and nanostructures are complicated by phonon interactions with grain and material boundaries. Phonon confinement in nanostructures and highly nonequilibrium rates of phonon generation by electrons also influence heat conduction. This article reviews experimental and theoretical studies of the thermal conductivity of single-crystal and polycrystalline silicon films, with a focus on data relevant for modeling heat transport in modern devices. Data for single-crystal films indicate a room-temperature thermal conductivity reduction of up to 50% compared to bulk silicon due to phonon boundary scattering, while grain boundary scattering in polysilicon films results in even lower values. Simple analytical expressions for approximating the room-temperature thermal conductivity of silicon films are provided. Doping modifies heat conduction mainly due to impurity scattering, and thermal conductivity data for boron-, phosphorus-, and arsenic-doped silicon films demonstrate the extent of this effect. Hotspots smaller than the phonon mean free path cause intense localized heating in silicon and severe departure from equilibrium within the phonon system, which can substantially increase the effective thermal resistance for conduction. This review provides an overview of the nanoscale conduction effects that are becoming important for the design of silicon nanostructures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The thermal conductivity of thin single-crystal silicon layers has been reported for a range of thicknesses from 20 nm to 3 μm.
“The thermal conductivity of thin single-crystal silicon layers has been reported for a range of thicknesses from 20 nm [8] to 3 l m [7,11,12].”
From Mean Free Path Effects on the Experimentally Measured Thermal Conductivity of Single-Crystal Silicon Microbridges (2013) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- McConnell, A. D., & Goodson, K. E.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Goodson, Kenneth E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Heat Transfer
- Publisher
- Begell House
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 129-168
- ISSN
- 1049-0787 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2334200269
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Reviews of Heat Transfer (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
- Keywords
- thermal conductivity, phonon boundary scattering, grain boundary scattering, phonon confinement, polysilicon films, single-crystal silicon films, impurity scattering, hot spots, thermal resistance, heat transfer modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review