Effective Thermal Conductivity of Frost
Abstract
If a temperature gradient exists in a frost layer energy is transferred from the warm to the cold side by molecular conduction, by water vapor diffusion, by radiation and occasionally by natural convection of the pore gas. A theoretical and experimental study has been carried out on the influence of these different transport mechanisms on the total energy flux in frost. This total energy flux can be represented by an effective thermal conductivity. An order of magnitude estimate and experiments on the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of frost indicate that radiation can be neglected. Natural convection cannot occur in horizontal frost layers forming opposite to the gravity vector. Furthermore, in other cases the contribution of natural convection in practically existing frost layers is normally negligible. There are, however, some uncertainties which should be studied by special experiments. The equivalent diffusion conductivity is mainly a function of the local temperature and the frost density. Measurements of the diffusion resistance in frost yield an equation for the diffusion heat flux. Its effect on the total heat flux reaches ratios of about 35% at 0°C and decreases rapidly with decreasing temperature and increasing density. Experimental data for pure molecular conduction are presented. Furthermore a simple pore model is defined with one parameter to be fitted to such data. The respective relationship for the conductivity due to conduction is in relatively good agreement with data of different authors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The water vapor diffusivity in air is based on the correlation from Auracher [31].
“The water vapor diffusivity in air 𝐷 wv , air is based on the correlation from Auracher [31].”
From Model for cyclic frosting and defrosting of flat tube heat exchangers: Theoretical analysis and experimental validation (2023) · cites this paper as Auracher [31]
Auracher [26] made the same conclusion as Sanders and presented a similar correlation of effective frost thermal conductivity.
“The same conclusion was also made by Auracher [26], who presented a similar correlation of effective frost thermal conductivity.”
From Frosting mechanism and behaviors on surfaces with simple geometries: A state-of-the-art literature review (2022) · cites this paper as Auracher [26]
Based on the review of related frosting studies, Sanders' and Auracher's correlations were more widely used than others.
“Based on the review of related frosting studies, it was found that Sanders ' and Auracher ' s correlations were more widely used than others.”
From Frosting mechanism and behaviors on surfaces with simple geometries: A state-of-the-art literature review (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 68
- Authors
- Auracher, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Stuttgart (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Auracher, H.
- Venue
- Proceeding of International Symposium on Heat and Mass Transfer in Refrigeration and Cryogenics
- Publisher
- Begellhouse
- Published
- 1986
- Pages
- 285-302
- OpenAlex
- W2343331730
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Symposium on Heat and Mass Transfer in Refrigeration and Cryogenics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
- Keywords
- frost, effective thermal conductivity, heat flux, molecular conduction, water vapor diffusion, radiation, natural convection, frost density, temperature dependence, pore model, frost layer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review