Cited by 68Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaHeat Transfer and Numerical MethodsPhase Change Materials Research

Effective Thermal Conductivity of Frost

Auracher, H.·1986·Proceeding of International Symposium on Heat and Mass Transfer in Refrigeration and Cryogenics

Abstract

If a temperature gradient exists in a frost layer energy is transferred from the warm to the cold side by molecular conduction, by water vapor diffusion, by radiation and occasionally by natural convection of the pore gas. A theoretical and experimental study has been carried out on the influence of these different transport mechanisms on the total energy flux in frost. This total energy flux can be represented by an effective thermal conductivity. An order of magnitude estimate and experiments on the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of frost indicate that radiation can be neglected. Natural convection cannot occur in horizontal frost layers forming opposite to the gravity vector. Furthermore, in other cases the contribution of natural convection in practically existing frost layers is normally negligible. There are, however, some uncertainties which should be studied by special experiments. The equivalent diffusion conductivity is mainly a function of the local temperature and the frost density. Measurements of the diffusion resistance in frost yield an equation for the diffusion heat flux. Its effect on the total heat flux reaches ratios of about 35% at 0°C and decreases rapidly with decreasing temperature and increasing density. Experimental data for pure molecular conduction are presented. Furthermore a simple pore model is defined with one parameter to be fitted to such data. The respective relationship for the conductivity due to conduction is in relatively good agreement with data of different authors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1615/ichmt.1986.intsymphmtinrefcryo.210

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 68

Authors
Auracher, H.
Affiliations
University of Stuttgart (DE)
Corresponding author
Auracher, H.
Venue
Proceeding of International Symposium on Heat and Mass Transfer in Refrigeration and Cryogenics
Publisher
Begellhouse
Published
1986
Pages
285-302
OpenAlex
W2343331730
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Symposium on Heat and Mass Transfer in Refrigeration and Cryogenics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
Keywords
frost, effective thermal conductivity, heat flux, molecular conduction, water vapor diffusion, radiation, natural convection, frost density, temperature dependence, pore model, frost layer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review