The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION FOR COMPLEX MODELS VIA BAYESIAN COMPRESSIVE SENSING
Open accessAbstract
Uncertainty quantification in complex physical models is often challenged by the computational expense of these models.One often needs to operate under the assumption of sparsely available model simulations.This issue is even more critical when models include a large number of input parameters.This "curse of dimensionality," in particular, leads to a prohibitively large number of basis terms in spectral methods for uncertainty quantification, such as polynomial chaos (PC) methods.In this work, we implement a PC-based surrogate model construction that "learns" and retains only the most relevant basis terms of the PC expansion, using sparse Bayesian learning.This dramatically reduces the dimensionality of the problem, making it more amenable to further analysis such as sensitivity or calibration studies.The model of interest is the community land model with about 80 input parameters, which also exhibits nonsmooth input-output behavior.We enhanced the methodology by a clustering and classifying procedure that leads to a piecewise-PC surrogate thereby dealing with nonlinearity.We then obtain global sensitivity information for five outputs with respect to all input parameters using less than 10,000 model simulations-a very small number for an 80-dimensional input parameter space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices
Saltelli, A. (2002) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(02)00280-1 · Cited by 2,228
Cited by
POLYNOMIAL-CHAOS-BASED KRIGING
Schobi, R., Sudret, B., & Wiart, J. (2015) · International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification · doi:10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2015012467 · Cited by 398
A global Fine‐Root Ecology Database to address below‐ground challenges in plant ecology
Iversen, C. M., McCormack, M. L., Powell, A. S., Blackwood, C. B., Freschet, G. T., Kattge, J., Roumet, C., Stover, D. B., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Valverde‐Barrantes, O. J., et al. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14486 · Cited by 386
Fisher, R. A., Muszala, S., Verteinstein, M., Lawrence, P., Xu, C., McDowell, N. G., Knox, R. G., Koven, C., Holm, J., Rogers, B. M., et al. (2015) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-8-3593-2015 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Sargsyan, K., Safta, C., Najm, H. N., Debusschere, B. J., Ricciuto, D., & Thornton, P.
- Venue
- International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification
- Publisher
- Begell House
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-93
- ISSN
- 2152-5080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2256307465
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION FOR COMPLEX MODELS VIA BAYESIAN COMPRESSIVE SENSING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2013006821
- The paper
- Sargsyan, K., Safta, C., Najm, H. N., Debusschere, B. J., Ricciuto, D., & Thornton, P. (2014). DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION FOR COMPLEX MODELS VIA BAYESIAN COMPRESSIVE SENSING. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification. https://doi.org/10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2013006821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.