The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LIMITATIONS OF PHYSICS INFORMED MACHINE LEARNING FOR NONLINEAR TWO-PHASE TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning techniques have recently been applied to a wide range of computational physics problems.In this paper, we focus on developing a physics-based approach that enables the neural network to learn the solution of a dynamic fluid-flow problem governed by a nonlinear partial differential equation (PDE).The main idea of physics informed machine learning (PIML) approaches is to encode the underlying physical law (i.e., the PDE) into the neural network as prior information.We investigate the applicability of the PIML approach to the forward problem of immiscible two-phase fluid transport in porous media, which is governed by a nonlinear first-order hyperbolic PDE subject to initial and boundary data.We employ the PIML strategy to solve this forward problem without any additional labeled data in the interior of the domain.Particularly, we are interested in nonconvex flux functions in the PDE, where the solution involves shocks and mixed waves (shocks and rarefactions).We have found that such a PIML approach fails to provide reasonable approximations to the solution in the presence of shocks in the saturation field.We investigated several architectures and experimented with a large number of neural-network parameters, and the overall finding is that PIML strategies that employ the nonlinear hyperbolic conservation equation in the loss function are inadequate.However, we have found that employing a parabolic form of the conservation equation, whereby a small amount of diffusion is added, the neural network is consistently able to learn accurate approximation of the solutions containing shocks and mixed waves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · Cited by 20,384
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766
(2010) · Cited by 14,134
Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.02971 · Cited by 10,782
Gulshan, V., Peng, L., Coram, M., Stumpe, M. C., Wu, D., Narayanaswamy, A., Venugopalan, S., Widner, K., Madams, T., Cuadros, J., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17216 · Cited by 7,697
Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Mnih, V., Badia, A. P., Mirza, M., Graves, A., Lillicrap, T. P., Harley, T., Silver, D., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.01783 · Cited by 7,132
Large-Scale Video Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks
Karpathy, A., Toderici, G., Shetty, S., Leung, T., Sukthankar, R., & Fei-Fei, L. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.223 · Cited by 6,354
Hydraulic properties of porous media
Brooks, R. H., & Corey, A. T. (1963) · Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) · Cited by 5,509
Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series
LeCun, Y., & Bengio, Y. (1998) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · doi:10.5555/303568.303704 · Cited by 4,231
Petroleum Reservoir Simulation
(2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2018-0-04535-1 · Cited by 3,012
Deep Neural Networks for Acoustic Modeling in Speech Recognition
Hinton, G. E., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G. E., Mohamed, A., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T. N., et al. (2012) · Cited by 1,839
(2006) · Optimal Control and Forecasting of Complex Dynamical Systems · doi:10.1142/9789812774248_0002 · Cited by 1,362
Zhu, Y., Zabaras, N., Koutsourelakis, P.-S., & Perdikaris, P. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.024 · Cited by 1,030
A hybrid neural network‐first principles approach to process modeling
Psichogios, D. C., & Ungar, L. H. (1992) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690381003 · Cited by 982
Artificial Neural Networks for Solving Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations
Lagaris, I. E., Likas, A., & Fotiadis, D. I. (1998) · Cited by 944
Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Nets
Li, H., Xu, Z., Taylor, G., Studer, C., & Goldstein, T. (2017) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000461393 · Cited by 926
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. G., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.10561 · Cited by 925
Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1992) · Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems · doi:10.1007/bf02134016 · Cited by 703
Detecting Cancer Metastases on Gigapixel Pathology Images
Liu, Y., Gadepalli, K., Norouzi, M., Dahl, G. E., Kohlberger, T., Boyko, A., Venugopalan, S., Timofeev, A., Nelson, P. Q., Corrado, G. S., et al. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.02442 · Cited by 506
Neural algorithm for solving differential equations
Lee, H., & Kang, I. S. (1990) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(90)90007-n · Cited by 436
Label-Free Supervision of Neural Networks with Physics and Domain Knowledge
Stewart, R., & Ermon, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10934 · Cited by 274
The numerical solution of linear ordinary differential equations by feedforward neural networks
Meade, A. J., & Fernandez, A. A. (1994) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/0895-7177(94)90095-7 · Cited by 256
Cited by
Bandai, T., & Ghezzehei, T. A. (2022) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-26-4469-2022 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuks, O., & Tchelepi, H. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Machine Learning for Modeling and Computing
- Publisher
- Begell House
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-37
- ISSN
- 2689-3967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3047245470
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
