The DOI matches its Crossref record.
"RESPECT ME FOR MY SCIENCE": A BOURDIEUIAN ANALYSIS OF WOMEN SCIENTISTS' INTERACTIONS WITH FACULTY AND SOCIALIZATION INTO SCIENCE
Abstract
Disparities in representation in the professoriate and recent research suggest that women continue to face challenges throughout their training. This study examines a specific aspect of scientific training− interactions with faculty−due to their role in socializing students into academic norms and values which can promote retention and success in science. While studies have highlighted the importance of faculty relationships in socialization, few studies have done so using a Bourdieuian framework (social capital, cultural capital, habitus, and field) or simultaneously addressed postdoctoral and graduate training experiences. This study uses Bourdieuian tools to frame an analysis of focus group data collected from 23 women who have completed PhDs in the biomedical sciences, focusing on how their relationships with faculty throughout their training experiences inform them about what it means to be a scientist, their alignment with these norms, and their access to important resources (social and cultural capital). Findings suggest that faculty interactions often suggested to women or led them to surmise that academic norms and values conflicted with their own as women. Further, women described negative and marginalizing interactions as limiting their access to important resources key to advancement in science.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“URM undergraduate and graduate students in science report feeling perceived by faculty and peers as less intellectually capable than white students (Carlone and Johnson, 2007; Hurtado et al., 2009; Griffin et al., 2015)”
From Race and Gender Differences in Undergraduate Research Mentoring Structures and Research Outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as Griffin et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Applying an intersectionality lens to expand equity in the geosciences
Núñez, A., Rivera, J., & Hallmark, T. (2019) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2019.1675131 · Cited by 132
Race and Gender Differences in Undergraduate Research Mentoring Structures and Research Outcomes
Aikens, M. L., Robertson, M. M., Sadselia, S., Watkins, K., Evans, M., Runyon, C. R., Eby, L. T., & Dolan, E. L. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0211 · Cited by 126
Sense of Belonging and Its Contributing Factors in Graduate Education
O’Meara, K., Griffin, K. A., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., & Robinson, T. (2017) · International journal of doctoral studies · doi:10.28945/3903 · Cited by 131
Self-citationGriffin, K. A. (2019) · Higher education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11743-6_4-1 · Cited by 91
Self-citationSubverting and Minding Boundaries: The Intellectual Work of Women
Gonzales, L. D. (2018) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2018.1434278 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffin, K., Gibbs, Jr., Bennett, J., Staples, C., & Robinson, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- Begell House
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-179
- ISSN
- 1072-8325 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2613221944
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- University of Chicago
- Pennsylvania State University
- Directorate for Education and Human Resources
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Keywords
- women in science, faculty-student relationships, social capital, cultural capital, habitus, fields, postdoctoral training, graduate education, biomedical sciences, gender inequality in academia, marginalization, access to resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "RESPECT ME FOR MY SCIENCE": A BOURDIEUIAN ANALYSIS OF WOMEN SCIENTISTS' INTERACTIONS WITH FACULTY AND SOCIALIZATION INTO SCIENCE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2015011143
- The paper
- Griffin, K., Gibbs, Jr., Bennett, J., Staples, C., & Robinson, T. (2015). "RESPECT ME FOR MY SCIENCE": A BOURDIEUIAN ANALYSIS OF WOMEN SCIENTISTS' INTERACTIONS WITH FACULTY AND SOCIALIZATION INTO SCIENCE. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2015011143