The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trend detection in river flow series: 2. Flood and low-flow index series / Détection de tendance dans des séries de débit fluvial: 2. Séries d'indices de crue et d'étiage
Open accessAbstract
Major floods in Europe and North America during the past decade have provoked the question of whether or not they are an effect of a changing climate. This study investigates changes in observational data, using up to 100-year-long daily mean river flow records at 21 stations worldwide. Trends in seven flood and low-flow index series are assessed using Mann-Kendall and linear regression methods. Emphasis was on the comparison of trends in these flow index series, particularly in peak-over-threshold (POT) series as opposed to annual maximum (AM) river flow series. There is a larger number of significant trends in the AM than in the POT flood magnitude series, probably relating to the way the series are constructed. Low flood peaks occurring at the beginning or end of a time series with trend may be too low to be selected for the POT analysis. However, one peak per year will always be selected for the AM series, making the slope steeper and/or the series longer, resulting in a more significant trend. There is no general pattern of increasing or decreasing numbers or magnitudes of floods, but there are significant increases in half of the low-flow series.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trend detection in hydrologic data: The Mann–Kendall trend test under the scaling hypothesis
Hamed, K. H. (2008) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.009 · Cited by 1,437
Large‐scale river flow archives: importance, current status and future needs
Hannah, D. M., Demuth, S., van Lanen, H. A. J., Looser, U., Prudhomme, C., Rees, G., Stahl, K., & Tallaksen, L. M. (2011) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.7794 · Cited by 405
At what scales do climate variability and land cover change impact on flooding and low flows?
Blöschl, G., Ardoin‐Bardin, S., Bonell, M., Dorninger, M., Goodrich, D., Gutknecht, D., Matamoros, D., Merz, B., Shand, P., & Szolgay, J. (2007) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.6669 · Cited by 393
Block bootstrap for Mann–Kendall trend test of serially dependent data
Önöz, B., & Bayazit, M. (2012) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.8438 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Svensson, C., Kundzewicz, W. Z., & Maurer, T.
- Venue
- Hydrological Sciences Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0262-6667 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-3435
- OpenAlex
- W2083376263
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trend detection in river flow series: 2. Flood and low-flow index series / Détection de tendance dans des séries de débit fluvial: 2. Séries d'indices de crue et d'étiage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1623/hysj.2005.50.5.811
- The paper
- Svensson, C., Kundzewicz, W. Z., & Maurer, T. (2005). Trend detection in river flow series: 2. Flood and low-flow index series / Détection de tendance dans des séries de débit fluvial: 2. Séries d'indices de crue et d'étiage. Hydrological Sciences Journal. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.2005.50.5.811
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.