The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in ecohydrological modelling with SWAT—a review
Open accessAbstract
Ecohydrology is an integrative science studying the relationships between hydrological, biogeochemical and ecological processes in soils, rivers and lakes, and at the catchment scale.It proposes a "dual regulation" of a system by simultaneously studying ecological and hydrological processes to enhance the overall integrity of aquatic ecosystems in the face of human-driven alterations and Global Change (see definition in the UNESCO Ecohydrology Programme at http://typo38.unesco.org/en/ecohydrology.html).Ecohydrology deals with hydrological factors which determine the dynamics of natural and human-driven terrestrial ecosystems, and which, together with ecological factors, influence water dynamics and water quality.River basins have a hierarchical structure and natural boundaries, and can be considered as inherent integrators of the effects of many climatic and non-climatic factors.That is why river basins represent a suitable scale for integrated ecohydrological studies and modelling.An ecohydrological river basin model includes a hydrological submodel as a basic component.Other components describing biogeochemical cycles (carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus) and vegetation are coupled with the hydrological component, in order to include important interactions and feedbacks between the processes, such as water and nutrient drivers for plant growth, water transpiration by plants, and nutrient transport with water.Generally, vertical and lateral fluxes of water and nutrients in catchments are modelled separately, whereas climate and land-use related parameters are treated as external drivers.The spatial and temporal resolution of a model depends on data availability and the aim of the study.The scale of application, spatial resolution and objective of the study are connected: a fine spatial resolution may be needed for a small catchment in order to study water flow components and their pathways using tracers; a lumped model may be sufficient for the case where "precipitation-runoff" relationships are investigated in a homogeneous medium-scale catchment; whereas a coarser resolution could be applied for a mesoscale or large river basin for climate impact assessment.There are many different classifications of river basin models.The differentiating principle could be the modelling approach or the scale of model application.For example, one can distinguish physically-based, conceptual, or black-box models; lumped and distributed models; and deterministic and stochastic models.A physically-based hydrological or ecohydrological model describes the natural system using mainly basic mathematical representations of physical laws governing the transfer of mass, momentum and energy.As a rule, such a model has to be fully distributed by accounting for spatial variations in all variables and parameters.However, the inclusion of physical laws in a model does not by itself guarantee its high quality.Even if physical laws included in the model represent a rigorous mathematical description for a soil column under laboratory conditions where soil has been well mixed, this may not automatically be the case at the scale of the grid elements used in distributed hydrological models: hundreds of metres or even kilometres (Beven, 1996).Besides, the so-called physically-based models often include empirical and statistical equations, especially to represent non-hydrological processes.In contrast, the description of important physical processes is lacking in the simplified conceptual hydrological models (e.g.water movement through soil layers) and, therefore, it is Open for discussion until
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x · Cited by 7,945
Self-citationEcotoxicology of human pharmaceuticals
Fent, K., Weston, A. A., & Caminada, D. (2006) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.09.009 · Cited by 3,223
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23637 · Cited by 3,040
Self-citation
Cited by
SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation
Arnold, J. G., Moriasi, D. N., Gassman, P. W., Abbaspour, K. C., White, M. J., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C., Harmel, R. D., van Griensven, A., Liew, M. W. V., et al. (2012) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.42256 · Cited by 3,450
Self-citationIntroduction to SWAT+, A Completely Restructured Version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool
Bieger, K., Arnold, J. G., Rathjens, H., White, M. J., Bosch, D. D., Allen, P. M., Volk, M., & Srinivasan, R. (2017) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/1752-1688.12482 · Cited by 608
Self-citationTransit times—the link between hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale
Hrachowitz, M., Benettin, P., van Breukelen, B. M., Fovet, O., Howden, N. J. K., Ruiz, L., van der Velde, Y., & Wade, A. J. (2016) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1155 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- KRYSANOVA, V., & ARNOLD, J. G.
- Venue
- Hydrological Sciences Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 939-947
- ISSN
- 0262-6667 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-3435
- OpenAlex
- W2050819806
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in ecohydrological modelling with SWAT—a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1623/hysj.53.5.939
- The paper
- KRYSANOVA, V., & ARNOLD, J. G. (2008). Advances in ecohydrological modelling with SWAT—a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.5.939
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.