The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Dynamics of Language and Exegesis at Qumran
Open accessAbstract
The authors in this volume address a series of issues raised by the discovery and publication of the Dead Sea Scrolls, centered around the Hebrew Bible and its interpretations in the Dead Sea Scrolls and related ancient Jewish compositions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Following Dimant (2009) and Kiel (2011, 2012), 4Q196 reflects a counteractive correction of reciprocal almsgiving as a means to gain righteousness, in order to advocate the 'proper disposition when performing a righteous act'.
“Following Dimant (2009) and Kiel (2011, 2012), I argue that 4Q196 reflects a counteractive correction of reciprocal almsgiving as a means to gain righteousness, in order to advocate the 'proper disposition when performing a righteous act'.”
From ‘Between righteousness and alms’ in Tobit: What was the author’s real intention? (2020) · cites this paper as Dimant 2009
The contents list (II. Biblical and Related Writings, p. 1) identifies Dimant’s chapter on Tobit and Qumran halakhah, but gives none of its argument. Searches for 4Q196, reciprocal almsgiving, and righteous disposition found no passage addressing those points. The sentence presents the proposed correction as the citing author’s own argument, so this copy cannot establish what Dimant contributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
‘Between righteousness and alms’ in Tobit: What was the author’s real intention?
Evans, A. H. (2020) · HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies · doi:10.4102/hts.v76i4.6136
Metadata
- Authors
- Dimant, D., & Kratz, R. G.
- Corresponding author
- Devorah Dimant
- ORCID
- Reinhard G. Kratz
- Venue
- Mohr Siebeck eBooks
- Publisher
- Mohr Siebeck
- Published
- 2009
- OpenAlex
- W592422577
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 21 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Mohr Siebeck eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Dead Sea Scrolls, Qumran, Hebrew Bible, biblical exegesis, ancient Jewish literature, Second Temple Judaism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
