Cited by 44Biblical Studies and InterpretationHistorical and Linguistic StudiesReformation and Early Modern Christianity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Use of the Old Testament in Hebrews

Open access
Docherty, Susan E.·2009·Mohr Siebeck eBooks

Abstract

This is a study of the way the Old Testament is interpreted in the New Testament Letter to the Hebrews. Susan Docherty gives particular attention to the similarities between the approach taken by the author of Hebrews and the methods of interpretation used in the Jewish tradition of biblical commentary.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1628/978-3-16-151603-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Docherty, S. E.
Affiliations
Birmingham Newman University (GB)
Corresponding author
Docherty, Susan E.
Venue
Mohr Siebeck eBooks
Publisher
Mohr Siebeck
Published
2009
OpenAlex
W2895626665
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.60
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Mohr Siebeck eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Keywords
Epistle to the Hebrews, Old Testament, biblical exegesis, New Testament use of the Old Testament, intertextuality, patristic exegesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review