The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Narrative Theology of the New Testament
Abstract
Is a post-liberal, narrative New Testament theology both consistent and explanative? Timo Eskola focusses on the metanarrative of exile and restoration and, by combining a post-New Quest perspective on Jesus with an eschatological reading of Paul, states that Jesus temple criticism aims at restoration eschatology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The fact that Jesus represents the foundation of the community's life and salvation is later confirmed as Peter acclaims Jesus as the »forerunner and saviour,« that is as the one who leads to life and guides towards salvation (Acts 5,31; Hebr 2,10), and nevertheless, as the one who judges the living and the dead (Acts 10,42; 17,31). (Eskola 2015)”
From Between Prophecy and Its Realisation. A Reading of Lk 1–2 and Acts 2–3 as a Fulfilment of the Isaianic Narrative (2020) · cites this paper as Eskola 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Celarc, M. (2020) · Edinost in dialog · doi:10.34291/edinost/75/02/celarc · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Eskola, T.
- Publisher
- Mohr Siebeck
- Published
- 2015
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Narrative Theology of the New Testament. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1628/978-3-16-154037-0
- The paper
- Eskola, T. (2015). A Narrative Theology of the New Testament. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-154037-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
