Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 87Biblical Studies and InterpretationPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesReformation and Early Modern Christianity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Acts and the Isaianic New Exodus

Pao, David W.·2019·Mohr Siebeck eBooks
DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-157216-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using the hermeneutical paradigm supplied by Isaiah, David W. Pao provides a new reading of the Acts of the Apostles. Thereby he casts light on the theological significance of the Lukan program as well as on the organizing principle behind the work.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1628/978-3-16-157216-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

See all 87

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pao, D. W.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Pao, David W.
Venue
Mohr Siebeck eBooks
Publisher
Mohr Siebeck
Published
2019
DOI
10.1628/978-3-16-157216-6
OpenAlex
W607403087
Semantic Scholar
c1e14551f2f8cb8bce3b9fc8f88fe06eb5f57eed
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
29.60
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mohr Siebeck eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Keywords
Acts of the Apostles, Isaiah, new exodus, New Testament hermeneutics, early Christianity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acts and the Isaianic New Exodus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1628/978-3-16-157216-6
The paper
Pao, D. W. (2019). Acts and the Isaianic New Exodus. Mohr Siebeck eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-157216-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.