In causis vero dissentiamus
Abstract
Hans-Michael Empell examines the classical Roman jurist Julians text from the second century A.D. relating to the conditions of an effective transfer of ownership. The authors fresh interpretation results in a better understanding of the famous antinomy between Julian and Ulpian.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Empell, H.-M.
- Affiliations
- Forschungsstätte der Evangelischen Studiengemeinschaft (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Empell, Hans-Michael
- Venue
- Mohr Siebeck eBooks
- Publisher
- Mohr Siebeck
- Published
- 2020
- OpenAlex
- W3089986444
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mohr Siebeck eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Classical Studies and Legal History
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal principles and applications
- Keywords
- Julian, Ulpian, property transfer, Roman law, Roman jurists, legal antinomies, 2nd century AD
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
