The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How international readers view Chinese academic journals: a survey of Chinese-speaking scholars in the UK
Open accessAbstract
To find out how international users gain access to and use Chinese- language academic journals, 37 Chinese mother-tongue scholars in the UK were interviewed. The results show that their usage of journals published in China in the Chinese language, although quite varied based on their disciplines, is limited, except for a few scholars from engineering and applied technology.The reasons why more than 70% of the respondents do not look up and use Chinese journals, although they say that they pay close attention to China’s research progress, are complicated. These reasons, as illustrated by the research, are examined in detail, and issues of quality, access, language and preconception are among the aspects discussed.The results show that the most pressing matters of the moment are to improve accessibility and to minimize the language barriers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A 2008 study that looked at native Chinese speakers in the United Kingdom found that those scholars have a negative view of publishing in Chinese journals, even though they believe that China is producing important scholarly work.”
From Seeking, Reading, and Use of Scholarly Articles: An International Study of Perceptions and Behavior of Researchers (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Is it enough to change the language? A case study of Croatian biomedical journals
Pulišelić, L., & Petrak, J. (2006) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1087/095315106778690733 · Cited by 22
Chinese academic journals: quality, issues and solutions
Wang, S., & Weldon, P. R. (2006) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1087/095315106776386995 · Cited by 17
China opening up: Chinese university journals and research — today and tomorrow
Stanley, A., & Shuai, Y. (2007) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1087/095315107779490652 · Cited by 16
Budapest Open Access Initiative: Frequently Asked Questions
Suber, P. (2011) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 13
How do we provide access to the content of scholarly research information?
Rowland, F. (2005) · Serials The Journal for the Serials Community · doi:10.1629/18218 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Dai, W, An analysis of international influence of the Chinese academic periodicals [in Chinese]. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 2004, (1), 111-118.
- Wei, L J, Pay attention on 'er' pronunciation in Chinese mandarin language level test [in Chinese]. Journal of Chinese, 2006(12), 146-147.
- Wang, Z W, Analysis on building of mandarin course in higher education [in Chinese]. Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Social Sciences Edition), 2006, 3(11), 168-169.
- Zhou, X M, Human Communication [in Chinese]. Shanghai, Shanghai Arts Press, 1990.
- Rowlands, I and Nicholas, D, New Journal Publishing Models -An International Survey of Senior Researchers. A CIBER Report for the Association of STM Publishers. London, University College London, 2005.
- Li, R X, Huang, Y, Ou, H , You, Z S and Rowland, F, A review of practice and research progress of Open Access in international scholarly publishing [in Chinese]. Acta Editologica, 2006, 18(3),237-240.
- Zou, C L, To develop science needs scientists learn thoroughly the 'globalization' language -English [in Chinese]. Impact of Science on Society, 2005(2), 54-55.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tenopir, C., Christian, L., & Kaufman, J. (2019) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications7010018 · Cited by 42
“Scholars also said they do not publish outside of Chinese journals due to poor English writing skills, competition, and formatting issues [39].”
BackgroundComparison between Chinese and English electronic resources
Zha, X., Li, J., & Yan, Y. (2013) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/07378831311303967 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, R., Rowland, F., & Meadows, J.
- Affiliations
- Chongqing Normal University (CN)
- Loughborough University (GB)
- ORCID
- Li, Ruoxi
- Venue
- Serials The Journal for the Serials Community
- Publisher
- Ubiquity Press, Ltd.
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-44
- ISSN
- 0953-0460 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.1629/2135
- OpenAlex
- W2018283636
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Serials The Journal for the Serials Community (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- journal usage, language barriers, journal accessibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
