Cited by 121Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal stem cell researchPluripotent Stem Cells Research

Global Gene Expression Profile of Human Cord Blood–Derived CD133+ Cells

Jaatinen, Taina, Hemmoranta, Heidi, Hautaniemi, Sampsa, Niemi, Jari, Nicorici, Daniel, Laine, Jarmo, Yli-Harja, Olli, Partanen, Jukka·2006·Stem Cells

Abstract

Human cord blood (CB)–derived CD133+ cells carry characteristics of primitive hematopoietic cells and proffer an alternative for CD34+ cells in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. To characterize the CD133+ cell population on a genetic level, a global expression analysis of CD133+ cells was performed using oligonucleotide microarrays. CD133+ cells were purified from four fresh CB units by immunomagnetic selection. All four CD133+ samples showed significant similarity in their gene expression pattern, whereas they differed clearly from the CD133+ control samples. In all, 690 transcripts were differentially expressed between CD133+ and CD133+ cells. Of these, 393 were increased and 297 were decreased in CD133+ cells. The highest overexpression was noted in genes associated with metabolism, cellular physiological processes, cell communication, and development. A set of 257 transcripts expressed solely in the CD133+ cell population was identified. Colony-forming unit (CFU) assay was used to detect the clonal progeny of precursors present in the studied cell populations. The results demonstrate that CD133+ cells express primitive markers and possess clonogenic progenitor capacity. This study provides a gene expression profile for human CD133+ cells. It presents a set of genes that may be used to unravel the properties of the CD133+ cell population, assumed to be highly enriched in HSCs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0185

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genes on AML-specific loops were enriched in hematopoiesis and myeloid transformation pathways.

    “Gene set enrichment analysis showed that genes on AML-specific loops were enriched in hematopoiesis and myeloid transformation pathways28,29 (Extended Data Fig. 4c).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 121

Authors
Jaatinen, T., Hemmoranta, H., Hautaniemi, S., Niemi, J., Nicorici, D., Laine, J., Yli-Harja, O., & Partanen, J.
Affiliations
  • Finnish Red Cross (FI)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Tampere University of Technology (FI)
Corresponding author
Partanen, Jukka
Venue
Stem Cells
Published
2005-10-06
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
631-641
ISSN
  • 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-4918
OpenAlex
W2080666748
Cited by
121
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stem Cells (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Keywords
CD133+ cells, umbilical cord blood, gene expression profiles, hematopoietic stem cells, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CD34+ cells, colony-forming units, differentially expressed transcripts, oligonucleotide microarrays
MeSH terms
AC133 Antigen, Cells, Cultured, Colony-Forming Units Assay, Fetal Blood, Gene Expression Regulation, Glycoproteins, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Peptides, Antigens, CD, Antigens, CD34, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review