The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Support of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal
Open accessAbstract
Human embryonic stem (ES) cells have most commonly been cultured in the presence of basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) either on fibroblast feeder layers or in fibroblast-conditioned medium. It has recently been reported that elevated concentrations of FGF2 permit the culture of human ES cells in the absence of fibroblasts or fibroblast-conditioned medium. Herein we compare the ability of unconditioned medium (UM) supplemented with 4, 24, 40, 80, 100, and 250 ng/ml FGF2 to sustain low-density human ES cell cultures through multiple passages. In these stringent culture conditions, 4, 24, and 40 ng/ml FGF2 failed to sustain human ES cells through three passages, but 100 ng/ml sustained human ES cells with an effectiveness comparable to conditioned medium (CM). Two human ES cell lines (H1 and H9) were maintained for up to 164 population doublings (7 and 4 months) in UM supplemented with 100 ng/ml FGF2. After prolonged culture, the cells formed teratomas when injected into severe combined immunodeficient beige mice and expressed markers characteristic of undifferentiated human ES cells. We also demonstrate that FGF2 is degraded more rapidly in UM than in CM, partly explaining the need for higher concentrations of FGF2 in UM. These results further facilitate the large-scale, routine culture of human ES cells and suggest that fibroblasts and fibro-blast-conditioned medium sustain human ES cells in part by stabilizing FGF signaling above a critical threshold.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The therapeutic potential of neural stem cells
Martino, G., & Pluchino, S. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1908 · Cited by 744
Feeder-independent culture of human embryonic stem cells
Ludwig, T. E., Bergendahl, V., Levenstein, M. E., Yu, J., Probasco, M. D., & Thomson, J. A. (2006) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth902 · Cited by 681
NANOG Is a Direct Target of TGFβ/Activin-Mediated SMAD Signaling in Human ESCs
Xu, R.-H., Sampsell-Barron, T. L., Gu, F., Root, S., Peck, R. M., Pan, G., Yu, J., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Tian, S., Stewart, R., et al. (2008) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.001 · Cited by 511
Self-citationBiomaterials for stem cell differentiation
Dawson, E., Mapili, G., Erickson, K., Taqvi, S., & Roy, K. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.037 · Cited by 448
Singh, A. M., Reynolds, D., Cliff, T., Ohtsuka, S., Mattheyses, A. L., Sun, Y., Menendez, L., Kulik, M., & Dalton, S. (2012) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.01.014 · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Levenstein, M. E., Ludwig, T. E., Xu, R.-H., Llanas, R. A., VanDenHeuvel-Kramer, K., Manning, D., & Thomson, J. A.
- Venue
- Stem Cells
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-11-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 568-574
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W1982960471
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Support of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/stemcells.2005-0247
- The paper
- Levenstein, M. E., Ludwig, T. E., Xu, R.-H., Llanas, R. A., VanDenHeuvel-Kramer, K., Manning, D., & Thomson, J. A. (2006). Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Support of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal. Stem Cells. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2005-0247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.