The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural Progenitor Cells Lack Immunogenicity and Resist Destruction as Allografts
Abstract
Multipotent, self-renewing stem and progenitor cells isolated from the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) have been shown to survive as allografts following transplantation to sites throughout the neuraxis. However, studies of this type shed little light upon the immunologic properties of the cells themselves, primarily because little is learned about the intrinsic immunogenic properties of a cell when it is grafted into an immune-privileged site. We have therefore investigated the immunogenic and antigenic properties of CNS progenitor cells by grafting them into a conventional (i.e., non-immune-privileged) site, namely, beneath the kidney capsule. Our results indicate that allogeneic CNS progenitor cells survive at least 4 weeks in a conventional site, during which time they neither sensitize their hosts nor express detectable levels of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or II. These in vivo data are in accord with flow cytometric results showing that CNS progenitor cells do not express MHC class I or class II, either at baseline or upon differentiation in 10% serum. Exposure to interferon gamma, however, reversibly upregulates expression of these key transplantation antigens. Together, these results reveal CNS progenitor cells to possess inherent immune privilege. Since CNS progenitor cell allografts were rejected beneath the kidney capsule following specific sensitization of the host, CNS progenitor cells were able to display alloantigens, albeit not in an immunogenic form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells
Okabe, M., Ikawa, M., Kominami, K., Nakanishi, T., & Nishimune, Y. (1997) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00313-x · Cited by 2,581
Transplantation of Embryonic Dopamine Neurons for Severe Parkinson's Disease
Freed, C. R., Greene, P. E., Breeze, R. E., Tsai, W.-Y., DuMouchel, W., Kao, R., Dillon, S., Winfield, H., Culver, S., Trojanowski, J. Q., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200103083441002 · Cited by 2,366
Functional requirement for class I MHC in CNS development and plasticity
Huh, G. S., Boulanger, L. M., Du, H., Riquelme, P. A., Brotz, T. M., & Shatz, C. J. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5499.2155 · Cited by 828
Cited by
Augello, A., Tasso, R., Negrini, S. M., Amateis, A., Indiveri, F., Cancedda, R., & Pennesi, G. (2005) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.200425405 · Cited by 696
Klassen, H. J., Ng, T. F., Kurimoto, Y., Kirov, I., Shatos, M., Coffey, P., & Young, M. J. (2004) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0511 · Cited by 324
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hori, J., Ng, T. F., Shatos, M., Klassen, H., Streilein, J. W., & Young, M. J.
- Venue
- STEM CELLS
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 405-416
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2068375644
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural Progenitor Cells Lack Immunogenicity and Resist Destruction as Allografts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/stemcells.21-4-405
- The paper
- Hori, J., Ng, T. F., Shatos, M., Klassen, H., Streilein, J. W., & Young, M. J. (2003). Neural Progenitor Cells Lack Immunogenicity and Resist Destruction as Allografts. STEM CELLS. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.21-4-405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.