Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

FDA Approval Summary: Temsirolimus as Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Open access
Kwitkowski, Virginia E., Prowell, Tatiana M., Ibrahim, Amna, Farrell, Ann T., Justice, Robert, Mitchell, Shan Sun, Sridhara, Rajeshwari, Pazdur, Richard·2010·The Oncologist

Abstract

Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Compare temsirolimus with IFN-α for the treatment of adults with treatment-naïve, advanced, poor-prognosis RCC and discuss the differences in OS time and PFS time for each.Enumerate the laboratory parameters that should be monitored at baseline and while patients are receiving temsirolimus and implement appropriate laboratory monitoring procedures. This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com This report summarizes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s approval of temsirolimus (Torisel®), on May 30, 2007, for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Information provided includes regulatory history, study design, study results, and literature review. A multicenter, three-arm, randomized, open-label study was conducted in previously untreated patients with poor-prognosis, advanced RCC. The study objectives were to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and safety in patients receiving interferon (IFN)-α versus those receiving temsirolimus alone or in combination with IFN-α. In the second planned interim analysis of the intent-to-treat population (n = 626), there was a statistically significant longer OS time in the temsirolimus (25 mg) arm than in the IFN-α arm (median, 10.9 months versus 7.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; p = .0078). The combination of temsirolimus (15 mg) and IFN-α did not lead to a significant difference in OS compared with IFN-α alone. There was also a statistically significant longer PFS time for the temsirolimus (25 mg) arm than for the IFN-α arm (median, 5.5 months versus 3.1 months; HR, 0.66, p = .0001). Common adverse reactions reported in patients receiving temsirolimus were rash, asthenia, and mucositis. Common laboratory abnormalities were anemia, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Serious but rare cases of interstitial lung disease, bowel perforation, and acute renal failure were observed. Temsirolimus has demonstrated superiority in terms of OS and PFS over IFN-α and provides an additional treatment option for patients with advanced RCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0178

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Kwitkowski, V. E., Prowell, T. M., Ibrahim, A., Farrell, A. T., Justice, R., Mitchell, S. S., Sridhara, R., & Pazdur, R.
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2010-03-23
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
428-435
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W2156242851
Cited by
254
References
0
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FDA Approval Summary: Temsirolimus as Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0178
The paper
Kwitkowski, V. E., Prowell, T. M., Ibrahim, A., Farrell, A. T., Justice, R., Mitchell, S. S., Sridhara, R., & Pazdur, R. (2010). FDA Approval Summary: Temsirolimus as Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. The Oncologist. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0178

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.