Cited by 54Health and Medical Research ImpactsGlobal Health and SurgeryAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy

Barriers and Challenges to Global Clinical Cancer Research

Open access
Seruga, Bostjan, Sadikov, Aleksander, Cazap, Eduardo L., Delgado, Lucia Beatriz, Digumarti, Raghunadharao, Leighl, Natasha B., Meshref, Mohamed M., Minami, Hironobu +4 more·2014·The Oncologist

Abstract

Background.: There are concerns about growing barriers to cancer research. We explored the characteristics of and barriers to global clinical cancer research. Methods.: The American Society of Clinical Oncology International Affairs Committee invited 300 selected oncologists with research experience from 25 countries to complete a Web-based survey. Fisher's exact test was used to compare answers between participants from high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Barriers to clinical cancer research were ranked from 1 (most important) to 8 (least important). Mann-Whitney's nonparametric test was used to compare the ranks describing the importance of investigated obstacles. Results.: Eighty oncologists responded, 41 from HICs and 39 from LMICs. Most responders were medical oncologists (62%) at academic hospitals (90%). Researchers from HICs were more involved with academic and industry-driven research than were researchers from LMICs. Significantly higher proportions of those who considered their ability to conduct academic research and industry-driven research over the past 5 years more difficult were from HICs (73% vs. 27% and 70% vs. 30%, respectively). Concerning academic clinical cancer research, a lack of funding was ranked the most important (score: 3.16) barrier, without significant differences observed between HICs and LMICs. Lack of time or competing priorities and procedures from competent authorities were the second most important barriers to conducting academic clinical research in HICs and LMICs, respectively. Conclusion.: Lack of funding, lack of time and competing priorities, and procedures from competent authorities might be the main global barriers to academic clinical cancer research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0290

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 54

Authors
Seruga, B., Sadikov, A., Cazap, E. L., Delgado, L. B., Digumarti, R., Leighl, N. B., Meshref, M. M., Minami, H., Robinson, E., Yamaguchi, N. H., Pyle, D., & Cufer, T.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia;
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
  • Latin American and Caribbean Society of Medical Oncology (AR)
  • Hospital de Clínicas (UY)
  • Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
  • Cairo University (EG)
  • Kobe University Hospital (JP)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (US)
  • University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2013-12-09
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
61-67
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W1991358323
Cited by
54
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Oncologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Society of Clinical Oncology International Affairs Committee
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Keywords
low- and middle-income countries, high-income countries, research funding, research capacity, regulatory process, competing priorities, oncologists' perspectives
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Medical Oncology, Global Health, Internet, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review