A visual health assessment of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) housed in India
Abstract
A visual health assessment and survey questionnaire was conducted on 81 Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) housed in 10 animal facilities throughout India between November 2004 and February 2005. The survey questionnaire consisted of 10 questions that evaluated the health of the elephants, and they were completed after visually assessing each individual elephant. The information collected was ranked on a scale that was used to statistically compare the health among the study subjects. This study documented that 43.21% of the captive elephants surveyed exhibited hyperkeratosis. A significant proportion of the elephants owned by tourist camps had poor skin condition when compared with elephants from zoos and at a forest camp. Similarly, captive-born individuals were found to have better skin condition than animals that were caught from the wild. Sixty (74.1%) of the captive elephants that were observed during this study had fissures in their footpads, 20% of which were severe. The prevalence of foot fissures was significantly higher in females. A greater proportion of elephants owned by tourist camps displayed vertical and horizontal toenail cracks in comparison with the forest camp and zoo elephants. It was noted that 76.9% of the wounded animals and 80% of those having abscesses were housed at temples and tourist camps. Also, approximately 8.5% of the captive elephant population observed during this study had eye-related problems, and they were all housed at temples and tourist camps. In conclusion, it was evident that elephants housed at temples or tourist camps exhibited poor skin condition with wounds and abscesses. These findings suggest that the overall condition of the elephants housed at tourist camps was poor compared with elephants housed at zoos and at the forest camp.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A visual assessment of 81 tourist and temple elephants in India between 2004-2005 found significant physical ailments, including 74% showing foot issues in the form of fissures, 20% of which were classified as severe, and 43% displaying hyperkeratosis.
“For example, a visual assessment of 81 tourist and temple elephants in India between 2004-2005 found significant physical ailments, including 74% showing foot issues in the form of fissures, 20% of which were classified as severe, and 43% displaying hyperkeratosis (Ramanathan & Mallapur, 2008”
From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Ramanathan & Mallapur, 2008
Comparable situations to those in tourist venues exist for logging, temple, and circus elephants.
“There is little doubt that comparable situations exist for logging (54), temple (55, 56), and circus (57) elephants as well.”
From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Ramanathan, A., & Mallapur, A.
- Affiliations
- International Fund for Animal Welfare (US)
- ORCID
- Ramanathan, Anand
- Venue
- Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 148-154
- ISSN
- 1042-7260 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2825
- OpenAlex
- W2170979060
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Keywords
- Asian elephant, captive elephants, hyperkeratosis, skin diseases, eye problems, tourist camps, zoos, forest camps, wildlife trade
- MeSH terms
- Abscess, Animals, Animals, Zoo, Elephants, Female, Foot, Health Status, India, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recreation, Sex Factors, Skin, Wounds and Injuries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review