Cited by 20Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Challenges to animal welfare during transportation of wild mammals: A review (1990–2020)

Pohlin, Friederike, Hooijberg, Emma H., Meyer, Leith C.R.·2021·Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine

Abstract

Wild mammal transport is an important component of conservation translocation as well as the economic wildlife trade. This article reviews the physiological responses to transport that have been measured in wild mammalian species, factors associated with these responses, and interventions that have been applied to mitigate these responses. By organizing the literature review along the "five domains model" of animal welfare, namely, the physical-functional domains (nutrition, environment, health, behavior) and the mental domain (mental state), it can be demonstrated that wild mammal transport is associated with challenges to ensuring positive animal welfare in all five domains. Transported wild mammals can experience dehydration, catabolism, fatigue, immunosuppression, behavioral changes, and stress. Factors influencing these physiological responses to transport have only been researched in a few studies encompassing species, journey length, ambient temperature, vehicle motion, stocking density, orientation, habituation, vehicle speed allowance, and road type. The administration of tranquilizers has been shown to mitigate negative physiological responses to transport. There is a need to further investigate species and situation-specific physiological responses to transport and factors associated with these responses in order to identify challenges to ensuring animal welfare and improving translocation success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1638/2019-0029

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pohlin, F., Hooijberg, E. H., & Meyer, L. C. R.
Affiliations
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Pohlin, Friederike
  • Hooijberg, Emma H.
  • Meyer, Leith C.R.
Venue
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 1042-7260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-2825
OpenAlex
W3145015156
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
animal welfare, conservation translocation, wildlife trade, Five Domains Model, physiological stress response, dehydration, catabolism, immunosuppression, behavior change, stocking density, vehicle motion, ambient temperature, tranquilizers, stress reduction
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Welfare, Animals, Wild, Mammals, Transportation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review